Skip to main content

Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Leening, MJG; Vedder, MM; Witteman, JCM; Pencina, MJ; Steyerberg, EW
Published in: Ann Intern Med
January 21, 2014

The net reclassification improvement (NRI) is an increasingly popular measure for evaluating improvements in risk predictions. This article details a review of 67 publications in high-impact general clinical journals that considered the NRI. Incomplete reporting of NRI methods, incorrect calculation, and common misinterpretations were found. To aid improved applications of the NRI, the article elaborates on several aspects of the computation and interpretation in various settings. Limitations and controversies are discussed, including the effect of miscalibration of prediction models, the use of the continuous NRI and “clinical NRI,” and the relation with decision analytic measures. A systematic approach toward presenting NRI analysis is proposed: Detail and motivate the methods used for computation of the NRI, use clinically meaningful risk cutoffs for the category-based NRI, report both NRI components, address issues of calibration, and do not interpret the overall NRI as a percentage of the study population reclassified. Promising NRI findings need to be followed with decision analytic or formal cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ann Intern Med

DOI

EISSN

1539-3704

Publication Date

January 21, 2014

Volume

160

Issue

2

Start / End Page

122 / 131

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Assessment
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Leening, M. J. G., Vedder, M. M., Witteman, J. C. M., Pencina, M. J., & Steyerberg, E. W. (2014). Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med, 160(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1522
Leening, Maarten J. G., Moniek M. Vedder, Jacqueline C. M. Witteman, Michael J. Pencina, and Ewout W. Steyerberg. “Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide.Ann Intern Med 160, no. 2 (January 21, 2014): 122–31. https://doi.org/10.7326/M13-1522.
Leening MJG, Vedder MM, Witteman JCM, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW. Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):122–31.
Leening, Maarten J. G., et al. “Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide.Ann Intern Med, vol. 160, no. 2, Jan. 2014, pp. 122–31. Pubmed, doi:10.7326/M13-1522.
Leening MJG, Vedder MM, Witteman JCM, Pencina MJ, Steyerberg EW. Net reclassification improvement: computation, interpretation, and controversies: a literature review and clinician's guide. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jan 21;160(2):122–131.

Published In

Ann Intern Med

DOI

EISSN

1539-3704

Publication Date

January 21, 2014

Volume

160

Issue

2

Start / End Page

122 / 131

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Assessment
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences