Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Development and implementation of a proficiency testing program for Luminex bead-based cytokine assays.

Journal articles  - Journal Article, Review
Lynch, HE; Sanchez, AM; D'Souza, MP; Rountree, W; Denny, TN; Kalos, M; Sempowski, GD
Published in: J Immunol Methods
July 2014

Luminex bead array assays are widely used for rapid biomarker quantification due to the ability to measure up to 100 unique analytes in a single well of a 96-well plate. There has been, however, no comprehensive analysis of variables impacting assay performance, nor development of a standardized proficiency testing program for laboratories performing these assays. To meet this need, the NIH/NIAID and the Cancer Immunotherapy Consortium of the Cancer Research Institute collaborated to develop and implement a Luminex assay proficiency testing program as part of the NIH/NIAID-sponsored External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) at Duke University. The program currently monitors 25 domestic and international sites with two external proficiency panels per year. Each panel includes a de-identified commercial Luminex assay kit with standards to quantify human IFNγ, TNFα, IL-6, IL-10 and IL-2, and a series of recombinant cytokine-spiked human serum samples. All aspects of panel development, testing and shipping are performed under GCLP by EQAPOL support teams. Following development testing, a comprehensive site proficiency scoring system comprised of timeliness, protocol adherence, accuracy and precision was implemented. The overall mean proficiency score across three rounds of testing has remained stable (EP3: 76%, EP4: 75%, EP5: 77%); however, a more detailed analysis of site reported results indicates a significant improvement of intra- (within) and inter- (between) site variation, suggesting that training and remediation for poor performing sites may be having a positive impact on proficiency. Through continued proficiency testing, identification of variables affecting Luminex assay outcomes will strengthen efforts to bring standardization to the field.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Immunol Methods

DOI

EISSN

1872-7905

Publication Date

July 2014

Volume

409

Start / End Page

62 / 71

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Workflow
  • Time Factors
  • Specimen Handling
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reference Standards
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Quality Control
  • Program Evaluation
  • Program Development
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lynch, H. E., Sanchez, A. M., D’Souza, M. P., Rountree, W., Denny, T. N., Kalos, M., & Sempowski, G. D. (2014). Development and implementation of a proficiency testing program for Luminex bead-based cytokine assays. J Immunol Methods, 409, 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.011
Lynch, Heather E., Ana M. Sanchez, M Patricia D’Souza, Wes Rountree, Thomas N. Denny, Michael Kalos, and Gregory D. Sempowski. “Development and implementation of a proficiency testing program for Luminex bead-based cytokine assays.J Immunol Methods 409 (July 2014): 62–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.011.
Lynch HE, Sanchez AM, D’Souza MP, Rountree W, Denny TN, Kalos M, et al. Development and implementation of a proficiency testing program for Luminex bead-based cytokine assays. J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jul;409:62–71.
Lynch, Heather E., et al. “Development and implementation of a proficiency testing program for Luminex bead-based cytokine assays.J Immunol Methods, vol. 409, July 2014, pp. 62–71. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.011.
Lynch HE, Sanchez AM, D’Souza MP, Rountree W, Denny TN, Kalos M, Sempowski GD. Development and implementation of a proficiency testing program for Luminex bead-based cytokine assays. J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jul;409:62–71.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Immunol Methods

DOI

EISSN

1872-7905

Publication Date

July 2014

Volume

409

Start / End Page

62 / 71

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Workflow
  • Time Factors
  • Specimen Handling
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Reference Standards
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Quality Control
  • Program Evaluation
  • Program Development