
Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes
Publication
, Journal Article
Hillygus, DS; Treul, SA
Published in: Public Choice
December 1, 2014
We examine the nature and extent of strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primary. In doing so, we distinguish positive strategic voters—those casting ballots for their second choice in the primary and general election—from negative strategic voters—those casting ballots for a candidate they want to lose in the general election. We find evidence of both types in 2008. Moreover, we show that the likelihood of voting strategically is related to the electoral and institutional context. Specifically, those who prefer trailing candidates and who live in states with open primaries or with elections after John McCain became the presumed nominee were more likely to vote strategically.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Public Choice
DOI
EISSN
1573-7101
ISSN
0048-5829
Publication Date
December 1, 2014
Volume
161
Issue
3-4
Start / End Page
517 / 536
Related Subject Headings
- Economics
- 4408 Political science
- 3801 Applied economics
- 1606 Political Science
- 1402 Applied Economics
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hillygus, D. S., & Treul, S. A. (2014). Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes. Public Choice, 161(3–4), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0183-1
Hillygus, D. S., and S. A. Treul. “Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes.” Public Choice 161, no. 3–4 (December 1, 2014): 517–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0183-1.
Hillygus DS, Treul SA. Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes. Public Choice. 2014 Dec 1;161(3–4):517–36.
Hillygus, D. S., and S. A. Treul. “Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes.” Public Choice, vol. 161, no. 3–4, Dec. 2014, pp. 517–36. Scopus, doi:10.1007/s11127-014-0183-1.
Hillygus DS, Treul SA. Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes. Public Choice. 2014 Dec 1;161(3–4):517–536.

Published In
Public Choice
DOI
EISSN
1573-7101
ISSN
0048-5829
Publication Date
December 1, 2014
Volume
161
Issue
3-4
Start / End Page
517 / 536
Related Subject Headings
- Economics
- 4408 Political science
- 3801 Applied economics
- 1606 Political Science
- 1402 Applied Economics