Skip to main content
construction release_alert
The Scholars Team is working with OIT to resolve some issues with the Scholars search index
cancel
Journal cover image

Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hillygus, DS; Treul, SA
Published in: Public Choice
December 1, 2014

We examine the nature and extent of strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primary. In doing so, we distinguish positive strategic voters—those casting ballots for their second choice in the primary and general election—from negative strategic voters—those casting ballots for a candidate they want to lose in the general election. We find evidence of both types in 2008. Moreover, we show that the likelihood of voting strategically is related to the electoral and institutional context. Specifically, those who prefer trailing candidates and who live in states with open primaries or with elections after John McCain became the presumed nominee were more likely to vote strategically.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Public Choice

DOI

EISSN

1573-7101

ISSN

0048-5829

Publication Date

December 1, 2014

Volume

161

Issue

3-4

Start / End Page

517 / 536

Related Subject Headings

  • Economics
  • 4408 Political science
  • 3801 Applied economics
  • 1606 Political Science
  • 1402 Applied Economics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hillygus, D. S., & Treul, S. A. (2014). Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes. Public Choice, 161(3–4), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0183-1
Hillygus, D. S., and S. A. Treul. “Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes.” Public Choice 161, no. 3–4 (December 1, 2014): 517–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-014-0183-1.
Hillygus, D. S., and S. A. Treul. “Assessing strategic voting in the 2008 US presidential primaries: the role of electoral context, institutional rules, and negative votes.” Public Choice, vol. 161, no. 3–4, Dec. 2014, pp. 517–36. Scopus, doi:10.1007/s11127-014-0183-1.
Journal cover image

Published In

Public Choice

DOI

EISSN

1573-7101

ISSN

0048-5829

Publication Date

December 1, 2014

Volume

161

Issue

3-4

Start / End Page

517 / 536

Related Subject Headings

  • Economics
  • 4408 Political science
  • 3801 Applied economics
  • 1606 Political Science
  • 1402 Applied Economics