Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of native light daily smokers and light daily smokers who were former heavy smokers.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Fish, LJ; Pollak, KI; Scheuermann, TS; Cox, LS; Mathur, C; Ahluwalia, JS
Published in: Nicotine Tob Res
May 2015

INTRODUCTION: An increasing proportion of daily smokers are light smokers (≤10 cigarettes per day). Some light smokers have never smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day (native light smokers) and others smoked at higher levels but have cut down (converted light smokers). It is important that we expand our understanding of these distinct subgroups of light smokers in order to develop effective interventions. METHODS: Data for this report come from a larger sample of smokers who completed a cross-sectional survey administered through an online panel survey service. The sample of 522 light smokers included 256 native light smokers and 266 as converted light smokers. The goal of the analysis was to examine demographic, smoking, and psychosocial factors that differentiate between native and converted light smokers. RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression results showed 4 variables that differentiated between native and converted light smokers. Native light smokers were more likely to be Black than White, smoke fewer cigarettes per day, smoked fewer total years, and had higher perceived risk of heart disease than converted light smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Native and converted light smokers are similar in many ways and also differ on some important characteristics. Further exploration of group difference is needed and could help to inform for cessation strategies for daily light smokers.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Nicotine Tob Res

DOI

EISSN

1469-994X

Publication Date

May 2015

Volume

17

Issue

5

Start / End Page

546 / 551

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • White People
  • United States
  • Tobacco Use Disorder
  • Smoking Cessation
  • Smoking
  • Public Health
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Logistic Models
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Fish, L. J., Pollak, K. I., Scheuermann, T. S., Cox, L. S., Mathur, C., & Ahluwalia, J. S. (2015). Comparison of native light daily smokers and light daily smokers who were former heavy smokers. Nicotine Tob Res, 17(5), 546–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu169
Fish, Laura J., Kathryn I. Pollak, Taneisha S. Scheuermann, Lisa Sanderson Cox, Charu Mathur, and Jasjit S. Ahluwalia. “Comparison of native light daily smokers and light daily smokers who were former heavy smokers.Nicotine Tob Res 17, no. 5 (May 2015): 546–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu169.
Fish LJ, Pollak KI, Scheuermann TS, Cox LS, Mathur C, Ahluwalia JS. Comparison of native light daily smokers and light daily smokers who were former heavy smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 May;17(5):546–51.
Fish, Laura J., et al. “Comparison of native light daily smokers and light daily smokers who were former heavy smokers.Nicotine Tob Res, vol. 17, no. 5, May 2015, pp. 546–51. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu169.
Fish LJ, Pollak KI, Scheuermann TS, Cox LS, Mathur C, Ahluwalia JS. Comparison of native light daily smokers and light daily smokers who were former heavy smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 May;17(5):546–551.
Journal cover image

Published In

Nicotine Tob Res

DOI

EISSN

1469-994X

Publication Date

May 2015

Volume

17

Issue

5

Start / End Page

546 / 551

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • White People
  • United States
  • Tobacco Use Disorder
  • Smoking Cessation
  • Smoking
  • Public Health
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Logistic Models