Skip to main content

Ordaining Women: The Diffusion of an Organizational Innovation

Publication ,  Journal Article
Chaves, MA
Published in: American Sociological Association
1995

Why do religious denominations vary in the extent to which they resist granting full clergy rights to women? Here, the extensive loose coupling between formal policy & actual practice concerning female access to religious positions are established indicating the symbolic rather than the practical importance of rules about women's ordination. Also offered is an event history analysis for US Christian denominations, focusing on the adoption of gender equality as official policy. The rate at which denominations begin to adopt gender equality is lower among denominations with largely southern constituencies, & it is higher during second wave feminism, among more recently established denominations, denominations tied via interdenominational networks to prior ordainers of women, denominations that are neither sacramental nor biblically inerrant, decentralized denominations, & denominations with autonomous women's mission organizations. Women's ordination emerges as a symbolic marker of a denomination's position vis-a-vis liberalism & modernism more than as a policy governing the internal affairs of religious organizations.

Duke Scholars

Published In

American Sociological Association

Publication Date

1995
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Chaves, M. A. (1995). Ordaining Women: The Diffusion of an Organizational Innovation. American Sociological Association.
Chaves, M. A. “Ordaining Women: The Diffusion of an Organizational Innovation.” American Sociological Association, 1995.
Chaves MA. Ordaining Women: The Diffusion of an Organizational Innovation. American Sociological Association. 1995;
Chaves, M. A. “Ordaining Women: The Diffusion of an Organizational Innovation.” American Sociological Association, 1995.
Chaves MA. Ordaining Women: The Diffusion of an Organizational Innovation. American Sociological Association. 1995;

Published In

American Sociological Association

Publication Date

1995