Physician opinion and the HHS contraceptives mandate
Background: The Health and Human Services (HHS) contraceptives mandate, recommended on the advice of the Institute of Medicine (IOM), has evoked a heated debate about whether religiously affiliated organizations should be required to provide contraceptive services contrary to their religious beliefs. The extent to which U.S. physicians agree with the contraceptives mandate remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 3,897 practicing U.S. physicians from all specialties to investigate their opinions on the mandate. Physicians were asked whether religiously affiliated institutions that object to the use of contraceptives should be required to cover contraceptives in their health plans. Results: Of 2,556 physician respondents (65% response rate), just over half opposed the legislation (52%). Respondents' sex, religious characteristics, and political self-characterization were all significantly associated with their views on the mandate. Physicians from specialties who treat women of reproductive age regularly did not differ significantly from U.S. physicians as a whole. Conclusions: U.S. physicians are divided on the issue of requiring religiously affiliated institutions to cover contraception when doing so conflicts with the institutions' stated values. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Duke Scholars
Published In
DOI
EISSN
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- 5001 Applied ethics
- 2201 Applied Ethics
- 1608 Sociology
Citation
Published In
DOI
EISSN
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- 5001 Applied ethics
- 2201 Applied Ethics
- 1608 Sociology