Preference Data for Environmental Valuation Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches
Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone?
Publication
, Chapter
González-Sepúlveda, JM; Loomis, JB
March 15, 2012
Duke Scholars
Publication Date
March 15, 2012
Start / End Page
289 / 302
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
González-Sepúlveda, J. M., & Loomis, J. B. (2012). Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone? In Preference Data for Environmental Valuation Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches (pp. 289–302).
González-Sepúlveda, J. M., and J. B. Loomis. “Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone?” In Preference Data for Environmental Valuation Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches, 289–302, 2012.
González-Sepúlveda JM, Loomis JB. Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone? In: Preference Data for Environmental Valuation Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches. 2012. p. 289–302.
González-Sepúlveda, J. M., and J. B. Loomis. “Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone?” Preference Data for Environmental Valuation Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches, 2012, pp. 289–302.
González-Sepúlveda JM, Loomis JB. Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone? Preference Data for Environmental Valuation Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches. 2012. p. 289–302.
Publication Date
March 15, 2012
Start / End Page
289 / 302