Skip to main content

Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209

Publication ,  Scholarly Edition
Arcidiacono, P; Aucejo, E; Coate, P; Hotz, VJ

Proposition 209 banned the use of racial preferences in admissions at public colleges in California. We analyze unique data for all applicants and enrollees within the University of California (UC) system before and after Prop 209. After Prop 209, graduation rates increased by 4.4%. We present evidence that certain institutions are better at graduating more-prepared students while other institutions are better at graduating less-prepared students and that these matching effects are particularly important for the bottom tail of the qualification distribution. We find that Prop 209 led to a more efficient sorting of minority students and the sorting effects explain over 20% of the graduation rate increase. Further, universities appear to have responded to Prop 209 by investing more in their students, explaining between 30-45% of the graduation rate increase.

Duke Scholars

 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E., Coate, P., & Hotz, V. J. (n.d.). Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209.
Arcidiacono, Peter, Esteban Aucejo, Patrick Coate, and V Joseph Hotz. “Affirmative Action and University Fit: Evidence from Proposition 209,” n.d.