Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mithal, P; Howard, LE; Aronson, WJ; Kane, CJ; Cooperberg, MR; Terris, MK; Amling, CL; Freedland, SJ
Published in: International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association
April 2015

To assess the ability of preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score and stage to predict prostate cancer outcomes beyond biochemical recurrence, specifically castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastases and prostate cancer-specific mortality in radical prostatectomy patients.We carried out a retrospective study of 2735 men in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database treated by radical prostatectomy from 1988 to 2011 with data available on pathological stage, grade and preoperative prostate-specific antigen. We used Cox hazards analyses to examine the predictive accuracy (c-index) of the preoperative prostate-specific antigen (log-transformed), path Gleason score (≤ 7, 3 + 4, 4 + 3 and 8-10) and path stage grouping (pT2 negative margins; pT2 positive margins; pT3a negative margins; pT3a positive margins; pT3b; vs positive nodes) to predict biochemical recurrence, castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastases and prostate cancer-specific mortality.Median follow up was 8.7 years, during which, 937 (34%) had biochemical recurrence, 108 (4%) castration-resistant prostate cancer, 127 (5%) metastases and 68 (2%) prostate cancer-specific mortality. For the outcomes of biochemical recurrence, castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastases and prostate cancer-specific mortality, the c-indices were, respectively: prostate-specific antigen 0.65, 0.66, 0.64 and 0.69; Gleason score 0.66, 0.83, 0.76 and 0.85; and pathological stage group 0.69, 0.76, 0.72 and 0.80.Gleason score can predict with very high accuracy prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Thus, Gleason score should be given more weight in nomograms to predict prostate cancer-specific mortality. Furthermore, men with a high Gleason score should be given special consideration for adjuvant treatment or referral to clinical trials because of a higher risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association

DOI

EISSN

1442-2042

ISSN

0919-8172

Publication Date

April 2015

Volume

22

Issue

4

Start / End Page

362 / 366

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Neoplasm Staging
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mithal, P., Howard, L. E., Aronson, W. J., Kane, C. J., Cooperberg, M. R., Terris, M. K., … Freedland, S. J. (2015). Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. International Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 22(4), 362–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12704
Mithal, Prabhakar, Lauren E. Howard, William J. Aronson, Christopher J. Kane, Matthew R. Cooperberg, Martha K. Terris, Christopher L. Amling, and Stephen J. Freedland. “Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.International Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association 22, no. 4 (April 2015): 362–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12704.
Mithal P, Howard LE, Aronson WJ, Kane CJ, Cooperberg MR, Terris MK, et al. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2015 Apr;22(4):362–6.
Mithal, Prabhakar, et al. “Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.International Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Japanese Urological Association, vol. 22, no. 4, Apr. 2015, pp. 362–66. Epmc, doi:10.1111/iju.12704.
Mithal P, Howard LE, Aronson WJ, Kane CJ, Cooperberg MR, Terris MK, Amling CL, Freedland SJ. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database. International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association. 2015 Apr;22(4):362–366.
Journal cover image

Published In

International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association

DOI

EISSN

1442-2042

ISSN

0919-8172

Publication Date

April 2015

Volume

22

Issue

4

Start / End Page

362 / 366

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant
  • Prostatic Neoplasms
  • Prostatectomy
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Neoplasm Staging