Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Prospective randomized double-blind comparison of moxalactam and tobramycin in treatment of urinary tract infections.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Abbruzzese, JL; Rocco, LE; Laskin, OL; Skubitz, KM; McGaughey, MD; Lipsky, JJ
Published in: Am J Med
April 1983

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, a regimen of 250 mg of moxalactam every 12 hours was compared with 1.0 mg/kg of tobramycin every eight hours in the treatment of urinary tract infections. One hundred and eleven patients were entered into the study; results in 63 (18 men and 45 women) were evaluable for both efficacy and toxicity. Thirty evaluable patients received moxalactam, and 33 received tobramycin. The mean duration of therapy in each group was seven days. There were six treatment failures in the moxalactam group and 10 failures in the tobramycin group (p greater than 0.4). Nephrotoxicity, defined as an increase in serum creatinine levels to 0.5 mg/dl or more, did not occur in either group. Thirteen patients in the moxalactam group and one in the tobramycin group had enterococci isolated from a urine culture specimen during or after therapy. It is concluded that use of the moxalactam regimen is as effective and safe as use of the tobramycin regimen in the treatment of urinary tract infections. The clinical significance of the enterococcal isolates associated with moxalactam therapy is yet to be determined.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am J Med

DOI

ISSN

0002-9343

Publication Date

April 1983

Volume

74

Issue

4

Start / End Page

694 / 699

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urinary Tract Infections
  • Tobramycin
  • Streptococcal Infections
  • Random Allocation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Moxalactam
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Abbruzzese, J. L., Rocco, L. E., Laskin, O. L., Skubitz, K. M., McGaughey, M. D., & Lipsky, J. J. (1983). Prospective randomized double-blind comparison of moxalactam and tobramycin in treatment of urinary tract infections. Am J Med, 74(4), 694–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)91029-x
Abbruzzese, J. L., L. E. Rocco, O. L. Laskin, K. M. Skubitz, M. D. McGaughey, and J. J. Lipsky. “Prospective randomized double-blind comparison of moxalactam and tobramycin in treatment of urinary tract infections.Am J Med 74, no. 4 (April 1983): 694–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(83)91029-x.
Abbruzzese JL, Rocco LE, Laskin OL, Skubitz KM, McGaughey MD, Lipsky JJ. Prospective randomized double-blind comparison of moxalactam and tobramycin in treatment of urinary tract infections. Am J Med. 1983 Apr;74(4):694–9.
Abbruzzese, J. L., et al. “Prospective randomized double-blind comparison of moxalactam and tobramycin in treatment of urinary tract infections.Am J Med, vol. 74, no. 4, Apr. 1983, pp. 694–99. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/0002-9343(83)91029-x.
Abbruzzese JL, Rocco LE, Laskin OL, Skubitz KM, McGaughey MD, Lipsky JJ. Prospective randomized double-blind comparison of moxalactam and tobramycin in treatment of urinary tract infections. Am J Med. 1983 Apr;74(4):694–699.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Med

DOI

ISSN

0002-9343

Publication Date

April 1983

Volume

74

Issue

4

Start / End Page

694 / 699

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urinary Tract Infections
  • Tobramycin
  • Streptococcal Infections
  • Random Allocation
  • Prospective Studies
  • Moxalactam
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine