Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Second-line chemotherapy use in metastatic colon cancer varies by disease responsiveness

Publication ,  Journal Article
Politano, S; Overman, M; Pathak, P; Chadha, R; Glover, K; Chang, DZ; Wolff, RA; Hoff, PM; Abbruzzese, J; Eng, C; Kopetz, S
Published in: Clinical Colorectal Cancer
January 1, 2008

Background: Improved survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to correlate with increased utilization of the 3 active cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), irinotecan, and oxaliplatin, usually administered in 2 lines of therapy. However, it is unclear which patient, disease, and treatment characteristics are associated with the utilization of a second-line regimen. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review. Patients with metastatic CRC treated with bevacizumab outside of a clinical trial and any infusional 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) regimen off-protocol (ie, 5-FU/LV/irinotecan [FOLFIRI]/bevacizumab or 5-FU/LV/oxaliplatin [FOLFOX]/bevacizumab) at the University of Texas M. D.Anderson Cancer Center between February 2004 and September 2005 were included. Prespecified characteristics of age, tumor burden, severe toxicity, and front-line regimen efficacy were compared with exploratory analyses of additional patient, disease, and treatment characteristics. Results: Eighty-seven sequential patients treated with the specified front-line regimens were identified. Seventy-six percent of the eligible patients were treated with a second-line regimen. Despite equal treatment durations, patients with a better response of stable disease were significantly less likely to receive a third cytotoxic agent than patients with a partial response (68% vs. 95%; odds ratio, 8.2; P = .02) due to declining performance status (86%) or patient preference (14%). This was associated with a decreased 2-year overall survival (86% vs. 55%). Neither age, tumor burden, nor development of toxicities were associated with a different utilization of a second-line regimen. Conclusion: Failure to obtain a response to initial chemotherapy for metastatic disease appears to be associated with decreased utilization of a second-line regimen.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clinical Colorectal Cancer

DOI

ISSN

1533-0028

Publication Date

January 1, 2008

Volume

7

Issue

1

Start / End Page

55 / 59

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Politano, S., Overman, M., Pathak, P., Chadha, R., Glover, K., Chang, D. Z., … Kopetz, S. (2008). Second-line chemotherapy use in metastatic colon cancer varies by disease responsiveness. Clinical Colorectal Cancer, 7(1), 55–59. https://doi.org/10.3816/CCC.2008.n.008
Politano, S., M. Overman, P. Pathak, R. Chadha, K. Glover, D. Z. Chang, R. A. Wolff, et al. “Second-line chemotherapy use in metastatic colon cancer varies by disease responsiveness.” Clinical Colorectal Cancer 7, no. 1 (January 1, 2008): 55–59. https://doi.org/10.3816/CCC.2008.n.008.
Politano S, Overman M, Pathak P, Chadha R, Glover K, Chang DZ, et al. Second-line chemotherapy use in metastatic colon cancer varies by disease responsiveness. Clinical Colorectal Cancer. 2008 Jan 1;7(1):55–9.
Politano, S., et al. “Second-line chemotherapy use in metastatic colon cancer varies by disease responsiveness.” Clinical Colorectal Cancer, vol. 7, no. 1, Jan. 2008, pp. 55–59. Scopus, doi:10.3816/CCC.2008.n.008.
Politano S, Overman M, Pathak P, Chadha R, Glover K, Chang DZ, Wolff RA, Hoff PM, Abbruzzese J, Eng C, Kopetz S. Second-line chemotherapy use in metastatic colon cancer varies by disease responsiveness. Clinical Colorectal Cancer. 2008 Jan 1;7(1):55–59.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clinical Colorectal Cancer

DOI

ISSN

1533-0028

Publication Date

January 1, 2008

Volume

7

Issue

1

Start / End Page

55 / 59

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis