Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kelly, RA; Jakeman, AJ; Barreteau, O; Borsuk, ME; ElSawah, S; Hamilton, SH; Henriksen, HJ; Kuikka, S; Maier, HR; Rizzoli, AE; van Delden, H ...
Published in: Environmental Modelling and Software
September 1, 2013

The design and implementation of effective environmental policies need to be informed by a holistic understanding of the system processes (biophysical, social and economic), their complex interactions, and how they respond to various changes. Models, integrating different system processes into a unified framework, are seen as useful tools to help analyse alternatives with stakeholders, assess their outcomes, and communicate results in a transparent way. This paper reviews five common approaches or model types that have the capacity to integrate knowledge by developing models that can accommodate multiple issues, values, scales and uncertainty considerations, as well as facilitate stakeholder engagement. The approaches considered are: systems dynamics, Bayesian networks, coupled component models, agent-based models and knowledge-based models (also referred to as expert systems). We start by discussing several considerations in model development, such as the purpose of model building, the availability of qualitative versus quantitative data for model specification, the level of spatio-temporal detail required, and treatment of uncertainty. These considerations and a review of applications are then used to develop a framework that aims to assist modellers and model users in the choice of an appropriate modelling approach for their integrated assessment applications and that enables more effective learning in interdisciplinary settings. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Environmental Modelling and Software

DOI

ISSN

1364-8152

Publication Date

September 1, 2013

Volume

47

Start / End Page

159 / 181

Related Subject Headings

  • Environmental Engineering
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kelly, R. A., Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Borsuk, M. E., ElSawah, S., Hamilton, S. H., … Voinov, A. A. (2013). Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environmental Modelling and Software, 47, 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005
Kelly, R. A., A. J. Jakeman, O. Barreteau, M. E. Borsuk, S. ElSawah, S. H. Hamilton, H. J. Henriksen, et al. “Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management.” Environmental Modelling and Software 47 (September 1, 2013): 159–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005.
Kelly RA, Jakeman AJ, Barreteau O, Borsuk ME, ElSawah S, Hamilton SH, et al. Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environmental Modelling and Software. 2013 Sep 1;47:159–81.
Kelly, R. A., et al. “Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management.” Environmental Modelling and Software, vol. 47, Sept. 2013, pp. 159–81. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005.
Kelly RA, Jakeman AJ, Barreteau O, Borsuk ME, ElSawah S, Hamilton SH, Henriksen HJ, Kuikka S, Maier HR, Rizzoli AE, van Delden H, Voinov AA. Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environmental Modelling and Software. 2013 Sep 1;47:159–181.
Journal cover image

Published In

Environmental Modelling and Software

DOI

ISSN

1364-8152

Publication Date

September 1, 2013

Volume

47

Start / End Page

159 / 181

Related Subject Headings

  • Environmental Engineering