Skip to main content

Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gedde, SJ; Heuer, DK; Parrish, RK; Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group
Published in: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
March 2010

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study is a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of tube-shunt surgery to trabeculectomy with mitomycin (MMC) in eyes with previous cataract and/or unsuccessful glaucoma surgery. This article reviews published results from the TVT Study. RECENT FINDINGS: Tube-shunt surgery had a higher success rate than trabeculectomy with MMC during the first 3 years of follow-up. Trabeculectomy with MMC produced greater intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction in the early postoperative period compared with tube-shunt placement, but similar IOPs were observed after 3 months. Tube-shunt surgery was associated with greater use of adjunctive-medical therapy than trabeculectomy with MMC during the first 2 years of the study, but no difference in medication use was seen at 3 years. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher after trabeculectomy with MMC compared with tube-shunt surgery, but serious complications associated with vision loss and/or reoperation developed with similar frequency after both surgical procedures. No difference in the rate of vision loss was present following trabeculectomy with MMC and tube-shunt surgery after 3 years of follow-up. Cataract progression was common, but occurred with similar frequency with both procedures. SUMMARY: Intermediate-term results of the TVT Study support the expanded use of tube shunts beyond refractory glaucomas. Tube-shunt surgery is an appropriate surgical option in patients who have undergone prior cataract and/or unsuccessful filtering surgery.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Curr Opin Ophthalmol

DOI

EISSN

1531-7021

Publication Date

March 2010

Volume

21

Issue

2

Start / End Page

123 / 128

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Trabeculectomy
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Mitomycin
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gedde, S. J., Heuer, D. K., Parrish, R. K., & Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. (2010). Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 21(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b68
Gedde, Steven J., Dale K. Heuer, Richard K. Parrish, and Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. “Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study.Curr Opin Ophthalmol 21, no. 2 (March 2010): 123–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b68.
Gedde SJ, Heuer DK, Parrish RK, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;21(2):123–8.
Gedde, Steven J., et al. “Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study.Curr Opin Ophthalmol, vol. 21, no. 2, Mar. 2010, pp. 123–28. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b68.
Gedde SJ, Heuer DK, Parrish RK, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;21(2):123–128.

Published In

Curr Opin Ophthalmol

DOI

EISSN

1531-7021

Publication Date

March 2010

Volume

21

Issue

2

Start / End Page

123 / 128

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Trabeculectomy
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Mitomycin
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Humans