Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel effects on platelet reactivity.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lhermusier, T; Lipinski, MJ; Tantry, US; Escarcega, RO; Baker, N; Bliden, KP; Magalhaes, MA; Ota, H; Tian, W; Pendyala, L; Minha, S; Chen, F ...
Published in: Am J Cardiol
March 15, 2015

Studies have linked on-treatment platelet reactivity (PR) to adverse clinical outcomes. Because new P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel and ticagrelor) have been predominantly tested against clopidogrel, data on pharmacodynamic comparisons between these 2 drugs are scarce. We compared ticagrelor with prasugrel in a network meta-analysis. PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE were searched for studies assessing PR in patients with coronary artery disease treated with ticagrelor or prasugrel. All studies using prasugrel and/or ticagrelor providing platelet function measurement data using VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units (PRUs), platelet reactivity index (PRI) vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation, or maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) by light transmission aggregometry were considered eligible. Mixed treatment comparison models directly compared ticagrelor and prasugrel and indirectly compared them using clopidogrel as a comparator with data presented as mean difference (95% confidence interval). Data were extracted from 29 studies, including 5,395 patients. Compared with clopidogrel 75 mg, both prasugrel 10 mg and ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily were associated with lower PRU (mean difference -117 [-134.1, -100.5] and -159.7 [-182.6, -136.6], respectively), a lower PRI (-24.2 [-28.2, -20.3] and -33.6 [-39.9, -27.6], respectively), and lower MPA (-11.8 [-17, -6.3] and -20.7 [-28.5, -12.8], respectively). Similar results were obtained with clopidogrel 150 mg. Ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily was associated with lower PRU (-42.5 [-62.9, -21.9]), lower PRI (-9.3 [-15.6, -3.5]), and lower MPA (-8.9 [-16.4, -1.2]) compared with prasugrel 10 mg. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that ticagrelor achieved significantly lower on-treatment PR compared with prasugrel, with both being superior to clopidogrel standard or high dose.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1879-1913

Publication Date

March 15, 2015

Volume

115

Issue

6

Start / End Page

716 / 723

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ticlopidine
  • Ticagrelor
  • Thiophenes
  • Research Design
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Prasugrel Hydrochloride
  • Platelet Aggregation
  • Piperazines
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lhermusier, T., Lipinski, M. J., Tantry, U. S., Escarcega, R. O., Baker, N., Bliden, K. P., … Waksman, R. (2015). Meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel effects on platelet reactivity. Am J Cardiol, 115(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.029
Lhermusier, Thibault, Michael J. Lipinski, Udaya S. Tantry, Ricardo O. Escarcega, Nevin Baker, Kevin P. Bliden, Marco A. Magalhaes, et al. “Meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel effects on platelet reactivity.Am J Cardiol 115, no. 6 (March 15, 2015): 716–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.029.
Lhermusier T, Lipinski MJ, Tantry US, Escarcega RO, Baker N, Bliden KP, et al. Meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel effects on platelet reactivity. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;115(6):716–23.
Lhermusier, Thibault, et al. “Meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel effects on platelet reactivity.Am J Cardiol, vol. 115, no. 6, Mar. 2015, pp. 716–23. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.12.029.
Lhermusier T, Lipinski MJ, Tantry US, Escarcega RO, Baker N, Bliden KP, Magalhaes MA, Ota H, Tian W, Pendyala L, Minha S, Chen F, Torguson R, Gurbel PA, Waksman R. Meta-analysis of direct and indirect comparison of ticagrelor and prasugrel effects on platelet reactivity. Am J Cardiol. 2015 Mar 15;115(6):716–723.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Cardiol

DOI

EISSN

1879-1913

Publication Date

March 15, 2015

Volume

115

Issue

6

Start / End Page

716 / 723

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ticlopidine
  • Ticagrelor
  • Thiophenes
  • Research Design
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Prasugrel Hydrochloride
  • Platelet Aggregation
  • Piperazines
  • Humans