Self-determination, revolution, and intervention
Publication
, Journal Article
Buchanan, A
Published in: Ethics
January 1, 2016
What limitations on intervention in support of democratic revolutions does proper regard for the collective right of self-determination impose? Some have held that if intervention in support of democratic revolutions is justified, it must cease once the authoritarian regime has been deposed-that any effort by the intervener to use force to shape the new political order would violate the people’s right of self-determination. This essay argues that proper regard for self-determination is compatible with much more extensive interventions.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Ethics
DOI
ISSN
0014-1704
Publication Date
January 1, 2016
Volume
126
Issue
2
Start / End Page
447 / 453
Related Subject Headings
- Philosophy
- 5003 Philosophy
- 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies
- 18 Law and Legal Studies
- 16 Studies in Human Society
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Buchanan, A. (2016). Self-determination, revolution, and intervention. Ethics, 126(2), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1086/683639
Buchanan, A. “Self-determination, revolution, and intervention.” Ethics 126, no. 2 (January 1, 2016): 447–53. https://doi.org/10.1086/683639.
Buchanan A. Self-determination, revolution, and intervention. Ethics. 2016 Jan 1;126(2):447–53.
Buchanan, A. “Self-determination, revolution, and intervention.” Ethics, vol. 126, no. 2, Jan. 2016, pp. 447–53. Scopus, doi:10.1086/683639.
Buchanan A. Self-determination, revolution, and intervention. Ethics. 2016 Jan 1;126(2):447–453.
Published In
Ethics
DOI
ISSN
0014-1704
Publication Date
January 1, 2016
Volume
126
Issue
2
Start / End Page
447 / 453
Related Subject Headings
- Philosophy
- 5003 Philosophy
- 22 Philosophy and Religious Studies
- 18 Law and Legal Studies
- 16 Studies in Human Society