Skip to main content

Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) ± cetuximab for patients (pts) with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC): CALGB 80203 preliminary results.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Venook, A; Niedzwiecki, D; Hollis, D; Sutherland, S; Goldberg, R; Alberts, S; Benson, A; Wade, J; Schilsky, R; Mayer, R
Published in: J Clin Oncol
June 20, 2006

3509 Background: FOLFIRI or FOLFOX are 1st-line treatments (Rx) for MCRC. Cetuximab is an IgG1 Mab that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and is approved as monotherapy or in combination with irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory, EGFR + pts with MCRC. CALGB 80203 randomized untreated MCRC pts to FOLFOX or FOLFIRI ± cetuximab (independent of EGFR status.) Methods: Pts with performance status 0-1 with tumor blocks available for EGFR analysis received either irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) over 1.5 hours (h) or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) over 2h combined with LV 400 mg/m(2) over 2h and 5FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus, then 46-48h CI 5FU 2400 mg/m(2) q o w. Cetuximab dose: 400 mg/m(2) loading dose, then 250 mg/m(2) qw. Rx continued until progression or toxicity; subsequent Rx was not mandated although information was collected on such rx. Accrual goal was 2200 pts with intended 1° endpt of overall survival (OS). 80203 closed administratively in 1/05 (due to slow accrual) with 238 pts accrued. 2° endpts of response rate (RR), progression free survival (PFS), duration of R and toxicity are now able to be analyzed. RESULTS: Accrual: FOLFIRI (A) - 61; FOLFIRI + cetuximab (B) - 59: FOLFOX (C) - 60; FOLFOX + cetuximab (D) - 58; approx median follow-up (f/u) is 12 months. RR (CR + PR, not all yet confirmed): A - 34%; B - 42%; C - 32%; D - 55%. RR was similar in the FOLFIRI or FOLFOX arms (A+B v. C+D; 38% v. 43%, p=0.44; chi-square) while C225 containing arms (B+D) v. non-C225 arms (A+C) had a superior RR (49% v. 33%; p=0.014, chi-square) It is too early to tell if there are differences in PFS, duration of response or OS. No significant differences in gr III diarrhea or any gr IV toxicities were seen. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that FOLFIRI and FOLFOX are similar in efficacy for pts with untreated MCRC and that adding cetuximab to either in1st-line Rx appears to increase response rates. PFS and duration of response do not appear different at this analysis. Further f/u and an analysis of prospective companion correlative studies may help to further clarify these results. [Table: see text].

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Clin Oncol

EISSN

1527-7755

Publication Date

June 20, 2006

Volume

24

Issue

18_suppl

Start / End Page

3509

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Venook, A., D. Niedzwiecki, D. Hollis, S. Sutherland, R. Goldberg, S. Alberts, A. Benson, J. Wade, R. Schilsky, and R. Mayer. “Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) ± cetuximab for patients (pts) with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC): CALGB 80203 preliminary results.J Clin Oncol 24, no. 18_suppl (June 20, 2006): 3509.
Venook A, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Sutherland S, Goldberg R, Alberts S, Benson A, Wade J, Schilsky R, Mayer R. Phase III study of irinotecan/5FU/LV (FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5FU/LV (FOLFOX) ± cetuximab for patients (pts) with untreated metastatic adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum (MCRC): CALGB 80203 preliminary results. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun 20;24(18_suppl):3509.

Published In

J Clin Oncol

EISSN

1527-7755

Publication Date

June 20, 2006

Volume

24

Issue

18_suppl

Start / End Page

3509

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences