
Clinical Trials Versus Clinical Practice: When Evidence and Practice Diverge--Should Nondiabetic Patients With 3-Vessel Disease and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Be Preferentially Treated With CABG?
Publication
, Journal Article
Kansara, P; Weiss, S; Weintraub, WS; Hann, MC; Tcheng, J; Rab, ST; Klein, LW; Interventional Council of the American College of Cardiology,
Published in: Jacc Cardiovasc Interv
November 2015
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Jacc Cardiovasc Interv
DOI
EISSN
1876-7605
Publication Date
November 2015
Volume
8
Issue
13
Start / End Page
1647 / 1656
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Treatment Outcome
- Stents
- Risk Factors
- Risk Assessment
- Registries
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Patient Selection
- Humans
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kansara, P., Weiss, S., Weintraub, W. S., Hann, M. C., Tcheng, J., Rab, S. T., … Interventional Council of the American College of Cardiology, . (2015). Clinical Trials Versus Clinical Practice: When Evidence and Practice Diverge--Should Nondiabetic Patients With 3-Vessel Disease and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Be Preferentially Treated With CABG? Jacc Cardiovasc Interv, 8(13), 1647–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.020
Kansara, Pranav, Sandra Weiss, William S. Weintraub, Matthew C. Hann, James Tcheng, S Tanveer Rab, Lloyd W. Klein, and Lloyd W. Interventional Council of the American College of Cardiology. “Clinical Trials Versus Clinical Practice: When Evidence and Practice Diverge--Should Nondiabetic Patients With 3-Vessel Disease and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Be Preferentially Treated With CABG?” Jacc Cardiovasc Interv 8, no. 13 (November 2015): 1647–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.020.
Kansara P, Weiss S, Weintraub WS, Hann MC, Tcheng J, Rab ST, et al. Clinical Trials Versus Clinical Practice: When Evidence and Practice Diverge--Should Nondiabetic Patients With 3-Vessel Disease and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Be Preferentially Treated With CABG? Jacc Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1647–56.
Kansara, Pranav, et al. “Clinical Trials Versus Clinical Practice: When Evidence and Practice Diverge--Should Nondiabetic Patients With 3-Vessel Disease and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Be Preferentially Treated With CABG?” Jacc Cardiovasc Interv, vol. 8, no. 13, Nov. 2015, pp. 1647–56. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.020.
Kansara P, Weiss S, Weintraub WS, Hann MC, Tcheng J, Rab ST, Klein LW, Interventional Council of the American College of Cardiology. Clinical Trials Versus Clinical Practice: When Evidence and Practice Diverge--Should Nondiabetic Patients With 3-Vessel Disease and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease Be Preferentially Treated With CABG? Jacc Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;8(13):1647–1656.

Published In
Jacc Cardiovasc Interv
DOI
EISSN
1876-7605
Publication Date
November 2015
Volume
8
Issue
13
Start / End Page
1647 / 1656
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Treatment Outcome
- Stents
- Risk Factors
- Risk Assessment
- Registries
- Practice Patterns, Physicians'
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Patient Selection
- Humans