Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Specialty-Based Variation in Applying Maternal-Fetal Surgery Trial Evidence.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Antiel, RM; Flake, AW; Johnson, MP; Khalek, N; Rintoul, NE; Lantos, JD; Curlin, FA; Tilburt, JC; Feudtner, C
Published in: Fetal Diagn Ther
2017

INTRODUCTION: The Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) compared prenatal with postnatal surgery for fetal myelomeningocele (MMC). We sought to understand how subspecialists interpreted the trial results and whether their practice has changed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, mailed survey of 1,200 randomly selected maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physicians, neonatologists, and pediatric surgeons. RESULTS: Of 1,176 eligible physicians, 670 (57%) responded. Compared to postnatal closure, 33% viewed prenatal closure as "very favorable" and 60% as "somewhat favorable." Most physicians reported being more likely to recommend prenatal surgery (69%), while 28% were less likely to recommend pregnancy termination. In multivariable analysis, neonatologists were more likely to report prenatal closure as "very favorable" (OR 1.6; 95% CI: 1.03-2.5). Pediatric surgeons and neonatologists were more likely to recommend prenatal closure (OR 2.1; 95% CI: 1.3-3.3, and OR 2.9; 95% CI: 1.8-4.6) and less likely to recommend termination (OR 3.8; 95% CI: 2.2-6.7, and OR 4.7; 95% CI: 2.7-8.1). In addition, physicians with a higher tolerance for prematurity were more likely to report prenatal closure as "very favorable" (OR 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.05). DISCUSSION: In light of the MOMS trial, the vast majority of pediatric subspecialists and MFMs view prenatal MMC closure favorably. These attitudes vary by specialty and risk tolerance.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Fetal Diagn Ther

DOI

EISSN

1421-9964

Publication Date

2017

Volume

42

Issue

3

Start / End Page

210 / 217

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Physicians
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Meningomyelocele
  • Humans
  • Fetoscopy
  • Female
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Attitude of Health Personnel
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Antiel, R. M., Flake, A. W., Johnson, M. P., Khalek, N., Rintoul, N. E., Lantos, J. D., … Feudtner, C. (2017). Specialty-Based Variation in Applying Maternal-Fetal Surgery Trial Evidence. Fetal Diagn Ther, 42(3), 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455024
Antiel, Ryan M., Alan W. Flake, Mark P. Johnson, Nahla Khalek, Natalie E. Rintoul, John D. Lantos, Farr A. Curlin, Jon C. Tilburt, and Chris Feudtner. “Specialty-Based Variation in Applying Maternal-Fetal Surgery Trial Evidence.Fetal Diagn Ther 42, no. 3 (2017): 210–17. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455024.
Antiel RM, Flake AW, Johnson MP, Khalek N, Rintoul NE, Lantos JD, et al. Specialty-Based Variation in Applying Maternal-Fetal Surgery Trial Evidence. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;42(3):210–7.
Antiel, Ryan M., et al. “Specialty-Based Variation in Applying Maternal-Fetal Surgery Trial Evidence.Fetal Diagn Ther, vol. 42, no. 3, 2017, pp. 210–17. Pubmed, doi:10.1159/000455024.
Antiel RM, Flake AW, Johnson MP, Khalek N, Rintoul NE, Lantos JD, Curlin FA, Tilburt JC, Feudtner C. Specialty-Based Variation in Applying Maternal-Fetal Surgery Trial Evidence. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;42(3):210–217.
Journal cover image

Published In

Fetal Diagn Ther

DOI

EISSN

1421-9964

Publication Date

2017

Volume

42

Issue

3

Start / End Page

210 / 217

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Physicians
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Meningomyelocele
  • Humans
  • Fetoscopy
  • Female
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Attitude of Health Personnel