Skip to main content

Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Davies, JE; Sen, S; Dehbi, H-M; Al-Lamee, R; Petraco, R; Nijjer, SS; Bhindi, R; Lehman, SJ; Walters, D; Sapontis, J; Janssens, L; Vrints, CJ ...
Published in: N Engl J Med
May 11, 2017

BACKGROUND: Coronary revascularization guided by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with better patient outcomes after the procedure than revascularization guided by angiography alone. It is unknown whether the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), an alternative measure that does not require the administration of adenosine, will offer benefits similar to those of FFR. METHODS: We randomly assigned 2492 patients with coronary artery disease, in a 1:1 ratio, to undergo either iFR-guided or FFR-guided coronary revascularization. The primary end point was the 1-year risk of major adverse cardiac events, which were a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization. The trial was designed to show the noninferiority of iFR to FFR, with a margin of 3.4 percentage points for the difference in risk. RESULTS: At 1 year, the primary end point had occurred in 78 of 1148 patients (6.8%) in the iFR group and in 83 of 1182 patients (7.0%) in the FFR group (difference in risk, -0.2 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.3 to 1.8; P<0.001 for noninferiority; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.33; P=0.78). The risk of each component of the primary end point and of death from cardiovascular or noncardiovascular causes did not differ significantly between the groups. The number of patients who had adverse procedural symptoms and clinical signs was significantly lower in the iFR group than in the FFR group (39 patients [3.1%] vs. 385 patients [30.8%], P<0.001), and the median procedural time was significantly shorter (40.5 minutes vs. 45.0 minutes, P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary revascularization guided by iFR was noninferior to revascularization guided by FFR with respect to the risk of major adverse cardiac events at 1 year. The rate of adverse procedural signs and symptoms was lower and the procedural time was shorter with iFR than with FFR. (Funded by Philips Volcano; DEFINE-FLAIR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02053038 .).

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

N Engl J Med

DOI

EISSN

1533-4406

Publication Date

May 11, 2017

Volume

376

Issue

19

Start / End Page

1824 / 1834

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Retreatment
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Davies, J. E., Sen, S., Dehbi, H.-M., Al-Lamee, R., Petraco, R., Nijjer, S. S., … Escaned, J. (2017). Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med, 376(19), 1824–1834. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700445
Davies, Justin E., Sayan Sen, Hakim-Moulay Dehbi, Rasha Al-Lamee, Ricardo Petraco, Sukhjinder S. Nijjer, Ravinay Bhindi, et al. “Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI.N Engl J Med 376, no. 19 (May 11, 2017): 1824–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1700445.
Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi H-M, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, et al. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824–34.
Davies, Justin E., et al. “Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI.N Engl J Med, vol. 376, no. 19, May 2017, pp. 1824–34. Pubmed, doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1700445.
Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi H-M, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Härle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo B-K, Nam C-W, Shin E-S, Doh J-H, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824–1834.

Published In

N Engl J Med

DOI

EISSN

1533-4406

Publication Date

May 11, 2017

Volume

376

Issue

19

Start / End Page

1824 / 1834

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Retreatment
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial