Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Composite measures of selection can improve the signal-to-noise ratio in genome scans

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lotterhos, KE; Card, DC; Schaal, SM; Wang, L; Collins, C; Verity, B
Published in: Methods in Ecology and Evolution
June 1, 2017

The growing wealth of genomic data is yielding new insights into the genetic basis of adaptation, but it also presents the challenge of extracting the relevant signal from multi-dimensional datasets. Different statistical approaches vary in their power to detect selection depending on the demographic history, type of selection, genetic architecture and experimental design. Here, we develop and evaluate new approaches for combining results from multiple tests, including multivariate distance measures and methods for combining P-values. We evaluate these methods on (i) simulated landscape genetic data analysed for differentiation outliers and genetic-environment associations and (ii) empirical genomic data analysed for selective sweeps within dog breeds for loci known to be selected for during domestication. We also introduce and evaluate how robust statistical algorithms can be used for parameter estimation in statistical genomics. On the simulated data, many of the composite measures performed well and had decreased variation in outcomes across many sampling designs. On the empirical dataset, methods based on combining P-values generally performed better with clearer signals of selection, higher significance of the signal, and in closer proximity to the known selected locus. Although robust algorithms could identify neutral loci in our simulations, they did not universally improve power to detect selection. Overall, a composite statistic that measured a robust multivariate distance from rank-based P-values performed the best. We found that composite measures of selection could improve the signal of selection in many cases, but they were not a panacea and their power is limited by the power of the univariate statistics they summarize. Since genome scans are widely used, improving inference for prioritizing candidate genes may be beneficial to medicine, agriculture, and breeding. Our results also have application to outlier detection in high-dimensional datasets and to combining results in meta-analyses in many disciplines. The compound measures we evaluate are implemented in the r package minotaur.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

DOI

EISSN

2041-210X

Publication Date

June 1, 2017

Volume

8

Issue

6

Start / End Page

717 / 727

Related Subject Headings

  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0603 Evolutionary Biology
  • 0602 Ecology
  • 0502 Environmental Science and Management
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lotterhos, K. E., Card, D. C., Schaal, S. M., Wang, L., Collins, C., & Verity, B. (2017). Composite measures of selection can improve the signal-to-noise ratio in genome scans. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 8(6), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12774
Lotterhos, K. E., D. C. Card, S. M. Schaal, L. Wang, C. Collins, and B. Verity. “Composite measures of selection can improve the signal-to-noise ratio in genome scans.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8, no. 6 (June 1, 2017): 717–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12774.
Lotterhos KE, Card DC, Schaal SM, Wang L, Collins C, Verity B. Composite measures of selection can improve the signal-to-noise ratio in genome scans. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2017 Jun 1;8(6):717–27.
Lotterhos, K. E., et al. “Composite measures of selection can improve the signal-to-noise ratio in genome scans.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution, vol. 8, no. 6, June 2017, pp. 717–27. Scopus, doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12774.
Lotterhos KE, Card DC, Schaal SM, Wang L, Collins C, Verity B. Composite measures of selection can improve the signal-to-noise ratio in genome scans. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2017 Jun 1;8(6):717–727.
Journal cover image

Published In

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

DOI

EISSN

2041-210X

Publication Date

June 1, 2017

Volume

8

Issue

6

Start / End Page

717 / 727

Related Subject Headings

  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 3109 Zoology
  • 3103 Ecology
  • 0603 Evolutionary Biology
  • 0602 Ecology
  • 0502 Environmental Science and Management