Skip to main content

Boma fortification is cost-effective at reducing predation of livestock in a high-predation zone in the Western Mara Region, Kenya

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sutton, AE; Downey, MG; Kamande, E; Munyao, F; Rinaldi, M; Taylor, AK; Pimm, S
Published in: Conservation Evidence
January 1, 2017

Lions Panthera leo kill livestock in the pastoral steppe of East Africa. The subsequent lethal retaliation by livestock owners has helped reduce lion numbers by more than 80% and driven the species from most of its historic range. This conflict is especially intense along the western edge of the Maasai Mara National Reserve in Kenya, where some of the densest lion and livestock populations in Africa overlap. We evaluated the effectiveness of implementation for one proposed solution – the Anne K. Taylor Fund’s subsidized construction of fortified, chain-link livestock fences (‘bomas’) – in reducing livestock loss to depredation. Between 2013 and 2015 we collected 343 predation reports, based on semi-structured interviews and predation records. We used these data to study the impact of subsidised boma fortification on the depredation of cattle, sheep and goats. Of 179 fortified bomas, 67% suffered no losses over one year whereas only 15% of 60 unfortified bomas had no losses over one year. Furthermore, losses of greater than five animals per year occurred at only 17% of fortified bomas, compared to 57% of unfortified bomas. The overall reduction in losses to predation at fortified bomas equated to savings of more than &1,200 USD per household per year.

Published In

Conservation Evidence

EISSN

1758-2067

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Volume

14

Start / End Page

32 / 38

Related Subject Headings

  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 0502 Environmental Science and Management
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sutton, A. E., Downey, M. G., Kamande, E., Munyao, F., Rinaldi, M., Taylor, A. K., & Pimm, S. (2017). Boma fortification is cost-effective at reducing predation of livestock in a high-predation zone in the Western Mara Region, Kenya. Conservation Evidence, 14, 32–38.
Sutton, A. E., M. G. Downey, E. Kamande, F. Munyao, M. Rinaldi, A. K. Taylor, and S. Pimm. “Boma fortification is cost-effective at reducing predation of livestock in a high-predation zone in the Western Mara Region, Kenya.” Conservation Evidence 14 (January 1, 2017): 32–38.
Sutton AE, Downey MG, Kamande E, Munyao F, Rinaldi M, Taylor AK, et al. Boma fortification is cost-effective at reducing predation of livestock in a high-predation zone in the Western Mara Region, Kenya. Conservation Evidence. 2017 Jan 1;14:32–8.
Sutton AE, Downey MG, Kamande E, Munyao F, Rinaldi M, Taylor AK, Pimm S. Boma fortification is cost-effective at reducing predation of livestock in a high-predation zone in the Western Mara Region, Kenya. Conservation Evidence. 2017 Jan 1;14:32–38.

Published In

Conservation Evidence

EISSN

1758-2067

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Volume

14

Start / End Page

32 / 38

Related Subject Headings

  • 4104 Environmental management
  • 0502 Environmental Science and Management