Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hachey, BJ; Kontos, MC; Newby, LK; Christenson, RH; Peacock, WF; Brewer, KC; McCord, J
Published in: J Am Heart Assoc
September 22, 2017

BACKGROUND: Various combinations of creatine kinase-MB, myoglobin, and cardiac troponin I or T (cTnI/cTnT) have been used to evaluate patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes. The current recommendation is to use the 99th percentile of cTnI/cTnT as the sole marker for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively analyzed cardiac marker protocols collected from 824 US hospitals undergoing Chest Pain Center Accreditation through the Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care from 2009 to 2014. Data were obtained by a self-reported survey that addressed cardiac marker(s), sampling time periods, and cut points used for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. The combination of cTnI or cTnT with creatine kinase-MB was the most commonly used biomarker strategy. Use of cTnI or cTnT as the sole marker increased over time (14-37%; P<0.0001), as did use of the 99th percentile cut point for cTnI/cTnT (30-60%; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is considerable variation in cardiac marker testing strategies used in US hospitals for evaluation of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Although increasing, 24% of hospitals used a cTn alone strategy, and only 49% used cTn at the recommended 99th percentile cut point. This has important implications for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Am Heart Assoc

DOI

EISSN

2047-9980

Publication Date

September 22, 2017

Volume

6

Issue

9

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Troponin T
  • Troponin I
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Prognosis
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hachey, B. J., Kontos, M. C., Newby, L. K., Christenson, R. H., Peacock, W. F., Brewer, K. C., & McCord, J. (2017). Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc, 6(9). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005852
Hachey, Brian J., Michael C. Kontos, L Kristin Newby, Robert H. Christenson, W Frank Peacock, Katherine C. Brewer, and James McCord. “Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction.J Am Heart Assoc 6, no. 9 (September 22, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005852.
Hachey BJ, Kontos MC, Newby LK, Christenson RH, Peacock WF, Brewer KC, et al. Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 22;6(9).
Hachey, Brian J., et al. “Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction.J Am Heart Assoc, vol. 6, no. 9, Sept. 2017. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.005852.
Hachey BJ, Kontos MC, Newby LK, Christenson RH, Peacock WF, Brewer KC, McCord J. Trends in Use of Biomarker Protocols for the Evaluation of Possible Myocardial Infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Sep 22;6(9).
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Heart Assoc

DOI

EISSN

2047-9980

Publication Date

September 22, 2017

Volume

6

Issue

9

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Troponin T
  • Troponin I
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Prognosis
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Humans