Management of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) in the era of biologics: Can ASCO’s net health benefits (NHB) inform our decisions?
Foote, J; Havrilesky, LJ; Jewell, EL; Gamble, C; Ehrisman, J; Broadwater, G; Coleman, RL; Cohn, DE; Secord, AA
Published in: Journal of Clinical Oncology
5544 Background: The ASCO value framework allows assessment of novel cancer therapies based on NHB. We assessed novel biologic therapies in the management of PSROC. Methods: ASCO’s revised value framework NHBs were constructed for key therapies based on randomized clinical trials for PSROC. BRCA-germline and HRD status were included. Additionally, patient-centered NHB calculations were weighted based on results from a prospective patient preferences study (n=54) and compared to ASCO-based NHB. Results: ASCO-centered NHB calculations were: platinum + taxane-based chemotherapy (ICON4) = 35; carboplatin + liposomal doxorubicin (CALYPSO) = 22; platinum-based chemotherapy + bevacizumab (OCEANS = 35; GOG 213 = 26). NHB scores based on germline-BRCA alterations were maintenance niraparib (NOVA) = 50 and maintenance olaparib (Study 19) = 62; wild-type BRCA, maintenance niraparib = 36 and maintenance olaparib = 33; and HRD-positive status, maintenance niraparib = 42. Patients valued clinical benefit as the most important component of NHB. Patients valued OS as the most important component of clinical benefit, followed by response rate (RR), then PFS. Patient-weighted NHB were significantly lower than ASCO-weighted scores (mean NHB 37.8 versus 23.5; p=0.009) due to decreased preference for PFS compared to other clinical benefit measures (Table). Conclusions: NHB scores for treatment of PSROC were highest in women with germline-BRCA and HRD tumor alterations who were treated with maintenance PARPi. Our data suggest that a patient-centered NHBs can be used to inform treatment decisions. [Table: see text]
