Skip to main content

On why procedural justice matters in court hearings: Experimental evidence that behavioral disinhibition weakens the association between procedural justice and evaluations of judges

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hulst, L; van den Bos, K; Akkermans, AJ; Lind, EA
Published in: Utrecht Law Review
January 1, 2017

Duke Scholars

Published In

Utrecht Law Review

DOI

EISSN

1871-515X

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Volume

13

Issue

3

Start / End Page

114 / 129

Related Subject Headings

  • 48 Law and legal studies
  • 1801 Law
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hulst, L., van den Bos, K., Akkermans, A. J., & Lind, E. A. (2017). On why procedural justice matters in court hearings: Experimental evidence that behavioral disinhibition weakens the association between procedural justice and evaluations of judges. Utrecht Law Review, 13(3), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.413
Hulst, L., K. van den Bos, A. J. Akkermans, and E. A. Lind. “On why procedural justice matters in court hearings: Experimental evidence that behavioral disinhibition weakens the association between procedural justice and evaluations of judges.” Utrecht Law Review 13, no. 3 (January 1, 2017): 114–29. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.413.

Published In

Utrecht Law Review

DOI

EISSN

1871-515X

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Volume

13

Issue

3

Start / End Page

114 / 129

Related Subject Headings

  • 48 Law and legal studies
  • 1801 Law