Skip to main content

Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Publication ,  Conference
Albright, CM; Emerson, JB; Werner, EF; Hughes, BL
Published in: Obstet Gynecol
September 2015

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost to prevent one case of congenital syphilis or fetal or neonatal death with universal third-trimester syphilis rescreening in the United States and to estimate the incidence of syphilis seroconversion at which rescreening becomes cost-effective. METHODS: We created a decision model comparing universal third-trimester syphilis rescreening in women who screened negative in the first trimester with no rescreening. The assumed base case incidence of seroconversion was 0.012%. The primary outcome was the cost to prevent one case of congenital syphilis. Secondary outcomes included the cost to prevent one fetal or neonatal death and the number needed to rescreen to prevent one adverse outcome. A strategy was considered cost-effective if it cost less than $285,000 to prevent one case of congenital syphilis (the estimated long-term care cost). RESULTS: Under our assumptions, universal third-trimester rescreening would cost an additional $419,842 for each case of congenital syphilis prevented and $3,621,144 and $6,052,534, respectively, for each fetal and neonatal death prevented. Rescreening 4,000,000 women would prevent 60 cases of congenital syphilis and seven fetal and four neonatal deaths. Prevention of one case of congenital syphilis would require 65,790 women be rescreened. Seroconversion incidence of 0.017% would make third-trimester rescreening cost-effective. CONCLUSION: Universal third-trimester syphilis rescreening requires a large number of women be rescreened at a high health care cost to prevent one adverse outcome from maternal syphilis. Seroconversion incidence must be 19-fold higher than the national average of primary and secondary syphilis in women for universal third-trimester rescreening to be cost-effective.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1873-233X

Publication Date

September 2015

Volume

126

Issue

3

Start / End Page

479 / 485

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Syphilis, Congenital
  • Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Prenatal Care
  • Pregnancy Trimester, Third
  • Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Mass Screening
  • Infant Mortality
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Albright, C. M., Emerson, J. B., Werner, E. F., & Hughes, B. L. (2015). Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. In Obstet Gynecol (Vol. 126, pp. 479–485). United States. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000997
Albright, Catherine M., Jenna B. Emerson, Erika F. Werner, and Brenna L. Hughes. “Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.” In Obstet Gynecol, 126:479–85, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000997.
Albright CM, Emerson JB, Werner EF, Hughes BL. Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. In: Obstet Gynecol. 2015. p. 479–85.
Albright, Catherine M., et al. “Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Obstet Gynecol, vol. 126, no. 3, 2015, pp. 479–85. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000997.
Albright CM, Emerson JB, Werner EF, Hughes BL. Third-Trimester Prenatal Syphilis Screening: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015. p. 479–485.

Published In

Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1873-233X

Publication Date

September 2015

Volume

126

Issue

3

Start / End Page

479 / 485

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Syphilis, Congenital
  • Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Prenatal Care
  • Pregnancy Trimester, Third
  • Pregnancy Complications, Infectious
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Mass Screening
  • Infant Mortality