Skip to main content

Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Hart, R; McCarthy, I; Oʼbrien, M; Bess, S; Line, B; Adjei, OB; Burton, D; Gupta, M; Ames, C; Deviren, V; Kebaish, K; Shaffrey, C; Wood, K ...
Published in: Spine (Phila Pa 1976)
September 1, 2013

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, consecutive case series. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to identify demographic and radiographical characteristics that influence the decision to perform revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure (PJF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Revision rates after PJF remain relatively high, yet the decision criteria for performing revision surgical procedures are not uniform and vary by surgeon. A better understanding of the factors that impact the decision to perform revision surgery is important in order to improve efficiency of surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity. METHODS: A cohort of 57 patients with PJF was identified retrospectively from 1218 consecutive patients with adult spinal deformity. PJF was identified on the basis of 10° postoperative increase in kyphosis between upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) and UIV +2, along with 1 or more of the following: fracture of the vertebral body of UIV or UIV +1, posterior osseoligamentous disruption, or pullout of instrumentation at the UIV. Univariate statistical analysis was performed using t tests and Fisher exact tests. Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty-seven (47.4%) patients underwent revision surgery within 6 months of the index operation. Regression results revealed that patients with combined posterior/anterior approaches at index were significantly more likely to undergo revision (P = 0.001) as were patients with more extreme proximal junctional kyphosis angulation (P = 0.034). Patients sustaining trauma were also significantly more likely to undergo revision (P = 0.019). Variables approaching but not reaching significance as predictors of revision included female sex (P = 0.066) and higher sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (P = 0.090). CONCLUSION: The decision to perform revision surgery is complicated and varies by surgeon. Factors that seem to influence this decision include traumatic etiology of PJF, severity of proximal junctional kyphosis angulation, higher SVA, and female sex. Factors that were expected to influence revision but had no statistical effect included soft tissue versus bony mode of failure, age, levels fused, and upper thoracic versus thoracolumbar proximal junction.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

DOI

EISSN

1528-1159

Publication Date

September 1, 2013

Volume

38

Issue

19

Start / End Page

E1223 / E1227

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Treatment Failure
  • Thoracic Vertebrae
  • Spinal Fusion
  • Scoliosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reoperation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Orthopedics
  • Middle Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hart, R., McCarthy, I., Oʼbrien, M., Bess, S., Line, B., Adjei, O. B., … International Spine Study Group. (2013). Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 38(19), E1223–E1227. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829fedde
Hart, Robert, Ian McCarthy, Michael Oʼbrien, Shay Bess, Brett Line, Oheneba Boachie Adjei, Doug Burton, et al. “Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity.Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38, no. 19 (September 1, 2013): E1223–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829fedde.
Hart R, McCarthy I, Oʼbrien M, Bess S, Line B, Adjei OB, et al. Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 1;38(19):E1223–7.
Hart, Robert, et al. “Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity.Spine (Phila Pa 1976), vol. 38, no. 19, Sept. 2013, pp. E1223–27. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829fedde.
Hart R, McCarthy I, Oʼbrien M, Bess S, Line B, Adjei OB, Burton D, Gupta M, Ames C, Deviren V, Kebaish K, Shaffrey C, Wood K, Hostin R, International Spine Study Group. Identification of decision criteria for revision surgery among patients with proximal junctional failure after surgical treatment of spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 1;38(19):E1223–E1227.

Published In

Spine (Phila Pa 1976)

DOI

EISSN

1528-1159

Publication Date

September 1, 2013

Volume

38

Issue

19

Start / End Page

E1223 / E1227

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Treatment Failure
  • Thoracic Vertebrae
  • Spinal Fusion
  • Scoliosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Reoperation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Orthopedics
  • Middle Aged