Skip to main content

Detecting differential copy number variation between groups of samples.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lowe, CB; Sanchez-Luege, N; Howes, TR; Brady, SD; Daugherty, RR; Jones, FC; Bell, MA; Kingsley, DM
Published in: Genome Res
February 2018

We present a method to detect copy number variants (CNVs) that are differentially present between two groups of sequenced samples. We use a finite-state transducer where the emitted read depth is conditioned on the mappability and GC-content of all reads that occur at a given base position. In this model, the read depth within a region is a mixture of binomials, which in simulations matches the read depth more closely than the often-used negative binomial distribution. The method analyzes all samples simultaneously, preserving uncertainty as to the breakpoints and magnitude of CNVs present in an individual when it identifies CNVs differentially present between the two groups. We apply this method to identify CNVs that are recurrently associated with postglacial adaptation of marine threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) to freshwater. We identify 6664 regions of the stickleback genome, totaling 1.7 Mbp, which show consistent copy number differences between marine and freshwater populations. These deletions and duplications affect both protein-coding genes and cis-regulatory elements, including a noncoding intronic telencephalon enhancer of DCHS1 The functions of the genes near or included within the 6664 CNVs are enriched for immunity and muscle development, as well as head and limb morphology. Although freshwater stickleback have repeatedly evolved from marine populations, we show that freshwater stickleback also act as reservoirs for ancient ancestral sequences that are highly conserved among distantly related teleosts, but largely missing from marine stickleback due to recent selective sweeps in marine populations.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Genome Res

DOI

EISSN

1549-5469

Publication Date

February 2018

Volume

28

Issue

2

Start / End Page

256 / 265

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Smegmamorpha
  • Selection, Genetic
  • Sampling Studies
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Genome
  • Fresh Water
  • DNA Copy Number Variations
  • Bioinformatics
  • Animals
  • Adaptation, Physiological
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lowe, C. B., Sanchez-Luege, N., Howes, T. R., Brady, S. D., Daugherty, R. R., Jones, F. C., … Kingsley, D. M. (2018). Detecting differential copy number variation between groups of samples. Genome Res, 28(2), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.206938.116
Lowe, Craig B., Nicelio Sanchez-Luege, Timothy R. Howes, Shannon D. Brady, Rhea R. Daugherty, Felicity C. Jones, Michael A. Bell, and David M. Kingsley. “Detecting differential copy number variation between groups of samples.Genome Res 28, no. 2 (February 2018): 256–65. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.206938.116.
Lowe CB, Sanchez-Luege N, Howes TR, Brady SD, Daugherty RR, Jones FC, et al. Detecting differential copy number variation between groups of samples. Genome Res. 2018 Feb;28(2):256–65.
Lowe, Craig B., et al. “Detecting differential copy number variation between groups of samples.Genome Res, vol. 28, no. 2, Feb. 2018, pp. 256–65. Pubmed, doi:10.1101/gr.206938.116.
Lowe CB, Sanchez-Luege N, Howes TR, Brady SD, Daugherty RR, Jones FC, Bell MA, Kingsley DM. Detecting differential copy number variation between groups of samples. Genome Res. 2018 Feb;28(2):256–265.

Published In

Genome Res

DOI

EISSN

1549-5469

Publication Date

February 2018

Volume

28

Issue

2

Start / End Page

256 / 265

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Smegmamorpha
  • Selection, Genetic
  • Sampling Studies
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
  • Genome
  • Fresh Water
  • DNA Copy Number Variations
  • Bioinformatics
  • Animals
  • Adaptation, Physiological