Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Prevalence and resource utilization for vocal fold paralysis/paresis after esophagectomy.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Crowson, MG; Tong, BC; Lee, H-J; Song, Y; Harpole, DH; Jones, HN; Cohen, S
Published in: Laryngoscope
December 2018

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Vocal fold paralysis/paresis (VFP) is an uncommon but serious complication following esophagectomy. The objectives of this study were to: 1) identify the prevalence of VFP and associated complications after esophagectomy in the United States, and 2) determine the utilization and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery/speech-language pathology (OHNS/SLP) and predictors of such utilization in the management of these patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) represents a 20% stratified sample of discharges from US hospitals. Using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes, patients undergoing esophagectomy between 2008 and 2013 were identified in the NIS. Subcohorts of patients with VFP and OHNS/SLP utilization were also identified. Weighted logistic regression models were used to compare binary outcomes such as complications; generalized linear models were used to compare total hospital charges and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: We studied 10,896 discharges, representing a weighted estimate of 52,610 patients undergoing esophagectomy. The incidence of VFP after esophagectomy was 1.96%. Compared to those without VFP, patients with VFP had a higher incidence of postoperative pneumonia, more medical complications, and were more likely to undergo tracheostomy; hospital charges and LOS were also higher. Of the patients with VFP, 35.0% received OHNS/SLP intervention. CONCLUSIONS: VFP after esophagectomy is associated with postoperative complications, prolonged LOS, and higher hospital costs. OHNS/SLP intervention occurred in roughly one-third of postesophagectomy VFP patients, suggesting there may be opportunities for enhanced evaluation and management of these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 128:2815-2822, 2018.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Laryngoscope

DOI

EISSN

1531-4995

Publication Date

December 2018

Volume

128

Issue

12

Start / End Page

2815 / 2822

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vocal Cords
  • Vocal Cord Paralysis
  • United States
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Prevalence
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Male
  • Incidence
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Crowson, M. G., Tong, B. C., Lee, H.-J., Song, Y., Harpole, D. H., Jones, H. N., & Cohen, S. (2018). Prevalence and resource utilization for vocal fold paralysis/paresis after esophagectomy. Laryngoscope, 128(12), 2815–2822. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27252
Crowson, Matthew G., Betty C. Tong, Hui-Jie Lee, Yao Song, David H. Harpole, Harrison N. Jones, and Seth Cohen. “Prevalence and resource utilization for vocal fold paralysis/paresis after esophagectomy.Laryngoscope 128, no. 12 (December 2018): 2815–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27252.
Crowson MG, Tong BC, Lee H-J, Song Y, Harpole DH, Jones HN, et al. Prevalence and resource utilization for vocal fold paralysis/paresis after esophagectomy. Laryngoscope. 2018 Dec;128(12):2815–22.
Crowson, Matthew G., et al. “Prevalence and resource utilization for vocal fold paralysis/paresis after esophagectomy.Laryngoscope, vol. 128, no. 12, Dec. 2018, pp. 2815–22. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/lary.27252.
Crowson MG, Tong BC, Lee H-J, Song Y, Harpole DH, Jones HN, Cohen S. Prevalence and resource utilization for vocal fold paralysis/paresis after esophagectomy. Laryngoscope. 2018 Dec;128(12):2815–2822.
Journal cover image

Published In

Laryngoscope

DOI

EISSN

1531-4995

Publication Date

December 2018

Volume

128

Issue

12

Start / End Page

2815 / 2822

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vocal Cords
  • Vocal Cord Paralysis
  • United States
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Registries
  • Prevalence
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Male
  • Incidence