Skip to main content

The validity, reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the patient specific functional scale in snake envenomation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gerardo, CJ; Vissoci, JRN; de Oliveira, LP; Anderson, VE; Quackenbush, E; Lewis, B; Rose, SR; Greene, S; Toschlog, EA; Charlton, NP; Denning, D ...
Published in: PLoS One
2019

OBJECTIVE: Valid, reliable, and clinically relevant outcome measures are necessary in clinical studies of snake envenomation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric (validity and reliability) and clinimetric (minimal clinically important difference [MCID]) properties of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) in snakebite envenomation. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of two existing snakebite trials that measured clinical outcomes using the PSFS as well as other quality of life and functional assessments. Data were collected at 3, 7, 10, and 17 days. Reliability was determined using Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for temporal stability at 10 and 17 days. Validity was assessed using concurrent validity correlating with the other assessments. The MCID was evaluated using the following criteria: (1) the distribution of stable patients according to both standard error of measurement (SEM) and responsiveness techniques, and (2) anchor-based methods to compare between individuals and to detect discriminant ability of a positive change with a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and optimal cutoff point. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients were evaluated in this study. The average PSFS scores were 5.37 (SD 3.23), 7.95 (SD 2.22), and 9.12 (SD 1.37) at 3, 7, and 10 days, respectively. Negligible floor effect was observed (maximum of 8% at 3 days); however, a ceiling effect was observed at 17 days (25%). The PSFS showed good reliability with an internal consistency of 0.91 (Cronbach's alpha) (95% CI 0.88, 0.95) and a temporal stability of 0.83 (ICC) (95% CI 0.72, 0.89). The PSFS showed a strong positive correlation with quality of life and functional assessments. The MCID was approximately 1.0 for all methods. CONCLUSIONS: With an MCID of approximately 1 point, the PSFS is a valid and reliable tool to assess quality of life and functionality in patients with snake envenomation.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

2019

Volume

14

Issue

3

Start / End Page

e0213077

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Snake Bites
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • ROC Curve
  • Quality of Life
  • Psychometrics
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gerardo, C. J., Vissoci, J. R. N., de Oliveira, L. P., Anderson, V. E., Quackenbush, E., Lewis, B., … Lavonas, E. J. (2019). The validity, reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the patient specific functional scale in snake envenomation. PLoS One, 14(3), e0213077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213077
Gerardo, Charles J., Joao R. N. Vissoci, Leonardo P. de Oliveira, Victoria E. Anderson, Eugenia Quackenbush, Brandon Lewis, S Rutherfoord Rose, et al. “The validity, reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the patient specific functional scale in snake envenomation.PLoS One 14, no. 3 (2019): e0213077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213077.
Gerardo CJ, Vissoci JRN, de Oliveira LP, Anderson VE, Quackenbush E, Lewis B, et al. The validity, reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the patient specific functional scale in snake envenomation. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213077.
Gerardo, Charles J., et al. “The validity, reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the patient specific functional scale in snake envenomation.PLoS One, vol. 14, no. 3, 2019, p. e0213077. Pubmed, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213077.
Gerardo CJ, Vissoci JRN, de Oliveira LP, Anderson VE, Quackenbush E, Lewis B, Rose SR, Greene S, Toschlog EA, Charlton NP, Mullins ME, Schwartz R, Denning D, Sharma K, Kleinschmidt K, Bush SP, Brandehoff NP, Lavonas EJ. The validity, reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the patient specific functional scale in snake envenomation. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213077.

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

2019

Volume

14

Issue

3

Start / End Page

e0213077

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Snake Bites
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • ROC Curve
  • Quality of Life
  • Psychometrics
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care