Skip to main content

Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Harvey, RL; Edwards, D; Dunning, K; Fregni, F; Stein, J; Laine, J; Rogers, LM; Vox, F; Durand-Sanchez, A; Bockbrader, M; Goldstein, LB ...
Published in: Stroke
September 2018

Background and Purpose- We aimed to determine whether low-frequency electric field navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to noninjured motor cortex versus sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation avoiding motor cortex could improve arm motor function in hemiplegic stroke patients when combined with motor training. Methods- Twelve outpatient US rehabilitation centers enrolled participants between May 2014 and December 2015. We delivered 1 Hz active or sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to noninjured motor cortex before each of eighteen 60-minute therapy sessions over a 6-week period, with outcomes measured at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months after end of treatment. The primary end point was the percentage of participants improving ≥5 points on upper extremity Fugl-Meyer score 6 months after end of treatment. Secondary analyses assessed changes on the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer and Action Research Arm Test and Wolf Motor Function Test and safety. Results- Of 199 participants, 167 completed treatment and follow-up because of early discontinuation of data collection. Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer gains were significant for experimental ( P<0.001) and sham groups ( P<0.001). Sixty-seven percent of the experimental group (95% CI, 58%-75%) and 65% of sham group (95% CI, 52%-76%) improved ≥5 points on 6-month upper extremity Fugl-Meyer ( P=0.76). There was also no difference between experimental and sham groups in the Action Research Arm Test ( P=0.80) or the Wolf Motor Function Test ( P=0.55). A total of 26 serious adverse events occurred in 18 participants, with none related to the study or device, and with no difference between groups. Conclusions- Among patients 3 to 12 months poststroke, goal-oriented motor rehabilitation improved motor function 6 months after end of treatment. There was no difference between the active and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation trial arms. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02089464.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Stroke

DOI

EISSN

1524-4628

Publication Date

September 2018

Volume

49

Issue

9

Start / End Page

2138 / 2146

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Upper Extremity
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Stroke
  • Quality of Life
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Motor Cortex
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Harvey, R. L., Edwards, D., Dunning, K., Fregni, F., Stein, J., Laine, J., … NICHE Trial Investigators *. (2018). Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke. Stroke, 49(9), 2138–2146. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020607
Harvey, Richard L., Dylan Edwards, Kari Dunning, Felipe Fregni, Joel Stein, Jarmo Laine, Lynn M. Rogers, et al. “Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke.Stroke 49, no. 9 (September 2018): 2138–46. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020607.
Harvey RL, Edwards D, Dunning K, Fregni F, Stein J, Laine J, et al. Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke. Stroke. 2018 Sep;49(9):2138–46.
Harvey, Richard L., et al. “Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke.Stroke, vol. 49, no. 9, Sept. 2018, pp. 2138–46. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020607.
Harvey RL, Edwards D, Dunning K, Fregni F, Stein J, Laine J, Rogers LM, Vox F, Durand-Sanchez A, Bockbrader M, Goldstein LB, Francisco GE, Kinney CL, Liu CY, NICHE Trial Investigators *. Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Navigated Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery in Stroke. Stroke. 2018 Sep;49(9):2138–2146.

Published In

Stroke

DOI

EISSN

1524-4628

Publication Date

September 2018

Volume

49

Issue

9

Start / End Page

2138 / 2146

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Upper Extremity
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Stroke
  • Quality of Life
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Motor Cortex
  • Middle Aged
  • Male