Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Smith, JS; Shaffrey, CI; Kim, HJ; Passias, P; Protopsaltis, T; Lafage, R; Mundis, GM; Klineberg, E; Lafage, V; Schwab, FJ; Scheer, JK; Hart, R ...
Published in: Global Spine J
May 2019

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Factors that predict outcomes for adult cervical spine deformity (ACSD) have not been well defined. To compare ACSD patients with best versus worst outcomes. METHODS: This study was based on a prospective, multicenter observational ACSD cohort. Best versus worst outcomes were compared based on Neck Disability Index (NDI), Neck Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NP-NRS), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scores. RESULTS: Of 111 patients, 80 (72%) had minimum 1-year follow-up. For NDI, compared with best outcome patients (n = 28), worst outcome patients (n = 32) were more likely to have had a major complication (P = .004) and to have undergone a posterior-only procedure (P = .039), had greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = .009), and had worse postoperative C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA; P = .027). For NP-NRS, compared with best outcome patients (n = 26), worst outcome patients (n = 18) were younger (P = .045), had worse baseline NP-NRS (P = .034), and were more likely to have had a minor complication (P = .030). For the mJOA, compared with best outcome patients (n = 16), worst outcome patients (n = 18) were more likely to have had a major complication (P = .007) and to have a better baseline mJOA (P = .030). Multivariate models for NDI included posterior-only surgery (P = .006), major complication (P = .002), and postoperative C7-S1 SVA (P = .012); models for NP-NRS included baseline NP-NRS (P = .009), age (P = .017), and posterior-only surgery (P = .038); and models for mJOA included major complication (P = .008). CONCLUSIONS: Factors distinguishing best and worst ACSD surgery outcomes included patient, surgical, and radiographic factors. These findings suggest areas that may warrant greater awareness to optimize patient counseling and outcomes.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Global Spine J

DOI

ISSN

2192-5682

Publication Date

May 2019

Volume

9

Issue

3

Start / End Page

303 / 314

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Smith, J. S., Shaffrey, C. I., Kim, H. J., Passias, P., Protopsaltis, T., Lafage, R., … Ames, C. P. (2019). Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery. Global Spine J, 9(3), 303–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218794164
Smith, Justin S., Christopher I. Shaffrey, Han Jo Kim, Peter Passias, Themistocles Protopsaltis, Renaud Lafage, Gregory M. Mundis, et al. “Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.Global Spine J 9, no. 3 (May 2019): 303–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218794164.
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Kim HJ, Passias P, Protopsaltis T, Lafage R, et al. Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery. Global Spine J. 2019 May;9(3):303–14.
Smith, Justin S., et al. “Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery.Global Spine J, vol. 9, no. 3, May 2019, pp. 303–14. Pubmed, doi:10.1177/2192568218794164.
Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Kim HJ, Passias P, Protopsaltis T, Lafage R, Mundis GM, Klineberg E, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Scheer JK, Kelly M, Hamilton DK, Gupta M, Deviren V, Hostin R, Albert T, Riew KD, Hart R, Burton D, Bess S, Ames CP. Comparison of Best Versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Cervical Deformity Surgery. Global Spine J. 2019 May;9(3):303–314.
Journal cover image

Published In

Global Spine J

DOI

ISSN

2192-5682

Publication Date

May 2019

Volume

9

Issue

3

Start / End Page

303 / 314

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences