
Healthcare Rationing Cutoffs and Sorites Indeterminacy.
Rationing is an unavoidable mechanism for reining in healthcare costs. It entails establishing cutoff points that distinguish between what is and is not offered or available to patients. When the resource to be distributed is defined by vague and indeterminate terms such as "beneficial," "effective," or even "futile," the ability to draw meaningful boundary lines that are both ethically and medically sound is problematic. In this article, I draw a parallel between the challenges posed by this problem and the ancient Greek philosophical conundrum known as the "sorites paradox." I argue, like the paradox, that the dilemma is unsolvable by conventional means of logical analysis. However, I propose another approach that may offer a practical solution that could be applicable to real-life situations in which cutoffs must be decided (such as rationing).
Duke Scholars
Published In
DOI
EISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Location
Related Subject Headings
- Philosophy, Medical
- Humans
- Health Care Rationing
- Decision Making
- Cost Control
- Applied Ethics
- 5003 Philosophy
- 5002 History and philosophy of specific fields
- 5001 Applied ethics
- 2203 Philosophy
Citation

Published In
DOI
EISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Location
Related Subject Headings
- Philosophy, Medical
- Humans
- Health Care Rationing
- Decision Making
- Cost Control
- Applied Ethics
- 5003 Philosophy
- 5002 History and philosophy of specific fields
- 5001 Applied ethics
- 2203 Philosophy