Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Blum, A; Behl, M; Birnbaum, L; Diamond, ML; Phillips, A; Singla, V; Sipes, NS; Stapleton, HM; Venier, M
Published in: Environmental science & technology letters
November 2019

As the use of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), and the entire class of organohalogen flame retardants, is declining, the use of organophosphate esters flame retardants (OPFRs) is increasing. In this paper, we ask whether OPFRs are a better choice than PBDEs. To address this question, we compared OPFRs with PBDEs for a wide range of properties. OPFRs exposure is ubiquitous in people and in outdoor and indoor environments, and are now often found at higher levels compared to PBDE peak exposure levels. Furthermore, data from toxicity testing, epidemiological studies, and risk assessments all suggest that there are health concerns at current exposure levels for both halogenated and non-halogenated OPFRs. Obtaining the scientific evidence needed for regulation of OPFRs can take many years. Given the large number of OPFRs in use, manufacturers can move towards healthier and safer products by developing innovative ways to reduce fire hazard for electronics enclosures, upholstered furniture, building materials and other consumer products without adding flame retardant chemicals.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Environmental science & technology letters

DOI

EISSN

2328-8930

ISSN

2328-8930

Publication Date

November 2019

Volume

6

Issue

11

Start / End Page

638 / 649

Related Subject Headings

  • 4105 Pollution and contamination
  • 4004 Chemical engineering
  • 1002 Environmental Biotechnology
  • 0907 Environmental Engineering
  • 0502 Environmental Science and Management
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Blum, A., Behl, M., Birnbaum, L., Diamond, M. L., Phillips, A., Singla, V., … Venier, M. (2019). Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers? Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 6(11), 638–649. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582
Blum, Arlene, Mamta Behl, Linda Birnbaum, Miriam L. Diamond, Allison Phillips, Veena Singla, Nisha S. Sipes, Heather M. Stapleton, and Marta Venier. “Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?Environmental Science & Technology Letters 6, no. 11 (November 2019): 638–49. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582.
Blum A, Behl M, Birnbaum L, Diamond ML, Phillips A, Singla V, et al. Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers? Environmental science & technology letters. 2019 Nov;6(11):638–49.
Blum, Arlene, et al. “Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers?Environmental Science & Technology Letters, vol. 6, no. 11, Nov. 2019, pp. 638–49. Epmc, doi:10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00582.
Blum A, Behl M, Birnbaum L, Diamond ML, Phillips A, Singla V, Sipes NS, Stapleton HM, Venier M. Organophosphate Ester Flame Retardants: Are They a Regrettable Substitution for Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers? Environmental science & technology letters. 2019 Nov;6(11):638–649.
Journal cover image

Published In

Environmental science & technology letters

DOI

EISSN

2328-8930

ISSN

2328-8930

Publication Date

November 2019

Volume

6

Issue

11

Start / End Page

638 / 649

Related Subject Headings

  • 4105 Pollution and contamination
  • 4004 Chemical engineering
  • 1002 Environmental Biotechnology
  • 0907 Environmental Engineering
  • 0502 Environmental Science and Management