Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Relative Measures of Association for Binary Outcomes: Challenges and Recommendations for the Global Health Researcher.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gallis, JA; Turner, EL
Published in: Ann Glob Health
November 20, 2019

BACKGROUND: Binary outcomes-which have two distinct levels (e.g., disease yes/no)-are commonly collected in global health research. The relative association of an exposure (e.g., a treatment) and such an outcome can be quantified using a ratio measure such as a risk ratio or an odds ratio. Although the odds ratio is more frequently reported than the risk ratio, many researchers, policymakers, and the general public frequently interpret it as a risk ratio. This is particularly problematic when the outcome is common because the magnitude of association is larger on the odds ratio scale than the risk ratio scale. Some recently published global health studies included misinterpretation of the odds ratio, which we hypothesize is because statistical methods for risk ratio estimation are not well known in the global health research community. OBJECTIVES: To compare and contrast available statistical methods to estimate relative measures of association for binary outcomes and to provide recommendations regarding their use. METHODS: Logistic regression for odds ratios and four approaches for risk ratios: two direct regression approaches (modified log-Poisson and log-binomial) and two indirect methods (standardization and substitution) based on logistic regression. FINDINGS: Illustrative examples demonstrate that misinterpretation of the odds ratio remains a common issue in global health research. Among the four methods presented for estimation of risk ratios, the modified log-Poisson approach is generally preferred because it has the best numerical performance and it is as easy to implement as is logistic regression for odds ratio estimation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, when study design allows, studies with binary outcomes should preferably report risk ratios to measure relative association.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ann Glob Health

DOI

EISSN

2214-9996

Publication Date

November 20, 2019

Volume

85

Issue

1

Start / End Page

137

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics as Topic
  • Odds Ratio
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • Global Health
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Biomedical Research
  • 4206 Public health
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gallis, J. A., & Turner, E. L. (2019). Relative Measures of Association for Binary Outcomes: Challenges and Recommendations for the Global Health Researcher. Ann Glob Health, 85(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2581
Gallis, John A., and Elizabeth L. Turner. “Relative Measures of Association for Binary Outcomes: Challenges and Recommendations for the Global Health Researcher.Ann Glob Health 85, no. 1 (November 20, 2019): 137. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2581.
Gallis, John A., and Elizabeth L. Turner. “Relative Measures of Association for Binary Outcomes: Challenges and Recommendations for the Global Health Researcher.Ann Glob Health, vol. 85, no. 1, Nov. 2019, p. 137. Pubmed, doi:10.5334/aogh.2581.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ann Glob Health

DOI

EISSN

2214-9996

Publication Date

November 20, 2019

Volume

85

Issue

1

Start / End Page

137

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Statistics as Topic
  • Odds Ratio
  • Logistic Models
  • Humans
  • Global Health
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Biomedical Research
  • 4206 Public health
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences