Skip to main content

Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Chen, J-T; Roberts, R; Fazzari, MJ; Kashani, K; Qadir, N; Cairns, CB; Mathews, K; Park, P; Khan, A; Gilmore, JF; Brown, ART; Tsuei, B ...
Published in: Crit Care Med
October 2020

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the association between the use of physiologic assessment (central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, passive leg raise test, and critical care ultrasound) with fluid and vasopressor administration 24 hours after shock onset and with in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort study between September 2017 and February 2018. SETTINGS: Thirty-four hospitals in the United States and Jordan. PATIENTS: Consecutive adult patients requiring admission to the ICU with systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg, mean arterial blood pressure less than or equal to 65 mm Hg, or need for vasopressor. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 1,639 patients enrolled, 39% had physiologic assessments. Use of physiologic assessment was not associated with cumulative fluid administered within 24 hours of shock onset, after accounting for baseline characteristics, etiology and location of shock, ICU types, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III, and hospital (beta coefficient, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.15). In multivariate analysis, the use of physiologic assessment was associated with a higher likelihood of vasopressor use (adjusted odds ratio, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.45-2.71) and higher 24-hour cumulative vasopressor dosing as norepinephrine equivalent (beta coefficient, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.55). The use of vasopressor was associated with increased odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.27-2.78). In-hospital mortality was not associated with the use of physiologic assessment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.63-1.18). CONCLUSIONS: The use of physiologic assessment in the 24 hours after shock onset is associated with increased use of vasopressor but not with fluid administration.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Crit Care Med

DOI

EISSN

1530-0293

Publication Date

October 2020

Volume

48

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1436 / 1444

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vasoconstrictor Agents
  • Shock
  • Prospective Studies
  • Organ Dysfunction Scores
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Humans
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Fluid Therapy
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Chen, J.-T., Roberts, R., Fazzari, M. J., Kashani, K., Qadir, N., Cairns, C. B., … VOLUME-CHASERS Study Group and Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Network. (2020). Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study. Crit Care Med, 48(10), 1436–1444. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004429
Chen, Jen-Ting, Russel Roberts, Melissa J. Fazzari, Kianoush Kashani, Nida Qadir, Charles B. Cairns, Kusum Mathews, et al. “Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study.Crit Care Med 48, no. 10 (October 2020): 1436–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000004429.
Chen J-T, Roberts R, Fazzari MJ, Kashani K, Qadir N, Cairns CB, et al. Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1436–44.
Chen, Jen-Ting, et al. “Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study.Crit Care Med, vol. 48, no. 10, Oct. 2020, pp. 1436–44. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004429.
Chen J-T, Roberts R, Fazzari MJ, Kashani K, Qadir N, Cairns CB, Mathews K, Park P, Khan A, Gilmore JF, Brown ART, Tsuei B, Handzel M, Lee Chang A, Duggal A, Lanspa M, Herbert JT, Martinez A, Tonna J, Ammar MA, Hammond D, Nazer LH, Heavner M, Pender E, Chambers L, Kenes MT, Kaufman D, Downey A, Brown B, Chaykosky D, Wolff A, Smith M, Nault K, Sevransky J, Gong MN, VOLUME-CHASERS Study Group and Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Network. Variation in Fluid and Vasopressor Use in Shock With and Without Physiologic Assessment: A Multicenter Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):1436–1444.

Published In

Crit Care Med

DOI

EISSN

1530-0293

Publication Date

October 2020

Volume

48

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1436 / 1444

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Vasoconstrictor Agents
  • Shock
  • Prospective Studies
  • Organ Dysfunction Scores
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Humans
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Fluid Therapy