Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview.

Publication ,  Journal Article
France, JL; France, CR; Carlson, BW; Kessler, DA; Rebosa, M; Shaz, BH; Madden, K; Carey, PM
Published in: Contemp Clin Trials
September 2015

First-time blood donors are essential to the US donor pool, providing nearly a third of all donations. Unfortunately, there are a wide variety of obstacles to repeat donation and new donors are extremely difficult to retain. Because each donor experiences a unique set of deterrents, we developed a post-donation interview based on motivational interview principles in order to flexibly address individual barriers. The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to examine retention of first-time, group O blood donors who are randomly assigned to receive either a telephone-delivered interview with motivational and action planning components or a standard-of-care control call approximately six weeks after their donation. Measures of donation attitude, perceived behavioral control, intention, and motivational autonomy will be measured before and after the telephone contact using online surveys, and donation attempts will be tracked for one year using blood center donor databases. We hypothesize that, compared to controls, donors who receive the telephone interview will be more likely to make a donation attempt over the following year. In addition, we will examine possible mechanisms of action of the interview using key predictors of donation behavior as described by Self Determination Theory (i.e., motivational autonomy) and the Theory of Planned Behavior (i.e., attitude, perceived behavioral control, and intention). Results of this intervention may help to support a novel strategy to enhance retention of selected blood donors in an effort to better meet the nation's blood supply needs.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Contemp Clin Trials

DOI

EISSN

1559-2030

Publication Date

September 2015

Volume

44

Start / End Page

64 / 69

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Public Health
  • General Clinical Medicine
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
France, J. L., France, C. R., Carlson, B. W., Kessler, D. A., Rebosa, M., Shaz, B. H., … Carey, P. M. (2015). Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview. Contemp Clin Trials, 44, 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.020
France, Janis L., Christopher R. France, Bruce W. Carlson, Debra A. Kessler, Mark Rebosa, Beth H. Shaz, Katrala Madden, and Patricia M. Carey. “Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview.Contemp Clin Trials 44 (September 2015): 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.020.
France JL, France CR, Carlson BW, Kessler DA, Rebosa M, Shaz BH, et al. Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Sep;44:64–9.
France, Janis L., et al. “Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview.Contemp Clin Trials, vol. 44, Sept. 2015, pp. 64–69. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.cct.2015.07.020.
France JL, France CR, Carlson BW, Kessler DA, Rebosa M, Shaz BH, Madden K, Carey PM. Motivating first-time, group O blood donors to return: Rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a post-donation telephone interview. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Sep;44:64–69.
Journal cover image

Published In

Contemp Clin Trials

DOI

EISSN

1559-2030

Publication Date

September 2015

Volume

44

Start / End Page

64 / 69

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Public Health
  • General Clinical Medicine
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences