What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis?: Commentary on Wunderlich
Publication
, Journal Article
Tomasello, M
Published in: Studies in Language
December 1, 2004
Duke Scholars
Published In
Studies in Language
DOI
EISSN
1569-9978
ISSN
0378-4177
Publication Date
December 1, 2004
Volume
28
Issue
3
Start / End Page
642 / 645
Related Subject Headings
- Languages & Linguistics
- 4704 Linguistics
- 4703 Language studies
- 2004 Linguistics
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Tomasello, M. (2004). What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis?: Commentary on Wunderlich. Studies in Language, 28(3), 642–645. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.3.13tom
Tomasello, M. “What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis?: Commentary on Wunderlich.” Studies in Language 28, no. 3 (December 1, 2004): 642–45. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.28.3.13tom.
Tomasello M. What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis?: Commentary on Wunderlich. Studies in Language. 2004 Dec 1;28(3):642–5.
Tomasello, M. “What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis?: Commentary on Wunderlich.” Studies in Language, vol. 28, no. 3, Dec. 2004, pp. 642–45. Scopus, doi:10.1075/sl.28.3.13tom.
Tomasello M. What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis?: Commentary on Wunderlich. Studies in Language. 2004 Dec 1;28(3):642–645.
Published In
Studies in Language
DOI
EISSN
1569-9978
ISSN
0378-4177
Publication Date
December 1, 2004
Volume
28
Issue
3
Start / End Page
642 / 645
Related Subject Headings
- Languages & Linguistics
- 4704 Linguistics
- 4703 Language studies
- 2004 Linguistics