Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sicard, RM; Frank-Ito, DO
Published in: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
February 2021

BACKGROUND: The conductive mechanisms of olfaction are typically given little priority in the evaluation of olfactory function. The objective of this study is to investigate the role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on airflow volume at the olfactory recess in healthy subjects. METHODS: Anatomically realistic three-dimensional nasal airway models were constructed from computed tomography scans in five subjects. Each individual's unilateral nasal cavity (10 total) was classified according to the shape of their nasal vestibule: Standard, Notched, or Elongated. Nasal airflow simulations were performed using computational fluid dynamics modeling at two inspiratory flow rates (15 L/min and 30 L/min) to reflect resting and moderate breathing rates. Olfactory airflow volume and cross-sectional flow resistance were computed. FINDINGS: Average olfactory airflow volumes (and percent airflow in olfactory) were: 0.25 L/min to 0.64 L/min (3.0%-7.7%; 15 L/min simulations) and 0.53 L/min to 1.30 L/min (3.2%-7.8%; 30 L/min simulations) for Standard; 0.13 L/min - 0.47 L/min (2.0%-6.8%; 15 L/min simulations) and 0.06 L/min - 0.82 L/min (1.7%-6.1%; 30 L/min simulations) for Notched; and 0.07 L/min - 0.39 L/min (1.2%-5.4%; 15 L/min simulations) and 0.30 L/min - 0.99 L/min (2.1%-6.7%; 30 L/min simulations) for Elongated. On average, relative difference in olfactory resistance between left and right sides was 141.5% for patients with different unilateral phenotypes and 82.2% for patients with identical unilateral phenotype. INTERPRETATION: Olfactory cleft airflow volume was highest in the Standard nasal vestibule phenotype, followed by Notched phenotype for 15 L/min simulations and Elongated phenotype for 30 L/min simulations. Further, intra-patient variation in olfactory cleft airflow resistance differs greatly for patients with different unilateral phenotypes compared to patients with identical unilateral phenotype.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)

DOI

EISSN

1879-1271

Publication Date

February 2021

Volume

82

Start / End Page

105282

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Smell
  • Orthopedics
  • Nasal Cavity
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Male
  • Hydrodynamics
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sicard, R. M., & Frank-Ito, D. O. (2021). Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 82, 105282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105282
Sicard, Ryan M., and Dennis O. Frank-Ito. “Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics.Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 82 (February 2021): 105282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105282.
Sicard RM, Frank-Ito DO. Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2021 Feb;82:105282.
Sicard, Ryan M., and Dennis O. Frank-Ito. “Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics.Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), vol. 82, Feb. 2021, p. 105282. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105282.
Sicard RM, Frank-Ito DO. Role of nasal vestibule morphological variations on olfactory airflow dynamics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2021 Feb;82:105282.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)

DOI

EISSN

1879-1271

Publication Date

February 2021

Volume

82

Start / End Page

105282

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Smell
  • Orthopedics
  • Nasal Cavity
  • Models, Anatomic
  • Male
  • Hydrodynamics
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cross-Sectional Studies