Skip to main content

Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Pierce, KE; Passias, PG; Brown, AE; Bortz, CA; Alas, H; Lafage, R; Krol, O; Chou, D; Burton, DC; Line, B; Klineberg, E; Hart, R; Gum, J ...
Published in: J Craniovertebr Junction Spine
2021

BACKGROUND: To optimize quality of life in patients with cervical deformity (CD), there may be alignment targets to be prioritized. OBJECTIVE: To prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. METHODS: Included: CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb >10°°, C2-C7 lordosis [CL] >10°°, cSVA > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle >25°°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical (C) or cervicothoracic (CT) Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (<4 cm) and T1 slope minus CL (TS-CL) (<15°°) were excluded. Patients assessed: Meeting Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for NDI (<-15 ΔNDI). Ratios of correction were found for regional parameters categorized by Primary Ames Driver (C or CT). Decision tree analysis assessed cut-offs for differences associated with meeting NDI MCID at 1Y. RESULTS: Seventy-seven CD patients (62.1 years, 64%F, 28.8 kg/m2). 41.6% met MCID for NDI. A backward linear regression model including radiographic differences as predictors from BL to 1Y for meeting MCID for NDI demonstrated an R 2= 0.820 (P = 0.032) included TS-CL, cSVA, MGS, C2SS, C2-T3 angle, C2-T3 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), CL. By primary Ames driver, 67.5% of patients were C, and 32.5% CT. Ratios of change in predictors for MCID NDI patients for C and CT were not significant between the two groups (P > 0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cut-offs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥42.5° C2-T3 angle, >35.4° CL, <-31.76° C2 slope, <-11.57 mm cSVA, <-2.16° MGS, >-30.8 mm C2-T3 SVA, and ≤-33.6° TS-CL. CONCLUSIONS: Certain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine

DOI

ISSN

0974-8237

Publication Date

2021

Volume

12

Issue

3

Start / End Page

311 / 317

Location

India

Related Subject Headings

  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Pierce, K. E., Passias, P. G., Brown, A. E., Bortz, C. A., Alas, H., Lafage, R., … International Spine Study Group. (2021). Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine, 12(3), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_26_21
Pierce, Katherine E., Peter Gust Passias, Avery E. Brown, Cole A. Bortz, Haddy Alas, Renaud Lafage, Oscar Krol, et al. “Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine 12, no. 3 (2021): 311–17. https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_26_21.
Pierce KE, Passias PG, Brown AE, Bortz CA, Alas H, Lafage R, et al. Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021;12(3):311–7.
Pierce, Katherine E., et al. “Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients.J Craniovertebr Junction Spine, vol. 12, no. 3, 2021, pp. 311–17. Pubmed, doi:10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_26_21.
Pierce KE, Passias PG, Brown AE, Bortz CA, Alas H, Lafage R, Krol O, Chou D, Burton DC, Line B, Klineberg E, Hart R, Gum J, Daniels A, Hamilton K, Bess S, Protopsaltis T, Shaffrey C, Schwab FA, Smith JS, Lafage V, Ames C, International Spine Study Group. Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2021;12(3):311–317.

Published In

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine

DOI

ISSN

0974-8237

Publication Date

2021

Volume

12

Issue

3

Start / End Page

311 / 317

Location

India

Related Subject Headings

  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences