Skip to main content

Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience

Publication ,  Journal Article
Zhu, X; Bouganim, N; Vandermeer, L; Dent, SF; Dranitsaris, G; Clemons, MJ
Published in: Current Oncology
January 1, 2012

Background: Use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (g-CSF) as primary prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia has significant cost implications. We examined use of g-csf for early-stage breast cancer patients at our centre. The study also examined the pattern of nurse-led patient teaching with respect to drug self-administration. Methods: Patients who received g-csf between November 2009 and October 2010 were identified from pharmacy records. After consent had been obtained, electronic charts were examined to extract data on chemotherapy and use of g-csf. Patients were contacted by telephone to obtain information on the utilization of home-care nursing visits for g-csf administration. Results: The study analyzed 36 patients. Median age was 58 years (range: 31-78 years). Of the 36 patients, 30 (83%) had received adjuvant treatment, and 6 (17%), neoadjuvant treatment. Most patients (71%) received 10 days (range: 7-10 days) of filgrastim. Of the 36 patients, 29 (81%) received g-csf as primary prophylaxis. In 90% of those patients, primary prophylaxis commenced with the taxane component of treatment. Of the 36 patients, 7 (19%) received g-csf after neutropenia, including 2 who had febrile neutropenia. In 96% of the patients, injections were received at home with thehelp of a nurse; those patients were subsequently taught self-injection techniques. The median number of nursing visits was 2 (range: 1-3 visits). Most patients were satisfied with the home care and g-csf teaching they received. Conclusions: Most of the g-csf used in breast cancer treatment during the study period was given for primary prophylaxis. A major reason for the decision to use g-csf appears to have been physician-perceived risk of febrile neutropenia. Delivery of g-csf by home-care nurses was well received by patients. © 2012 Multimed Inc.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Current Oncology

DOI

EISSN

1718-7729

Publication Date

January 1, 2012

Volume

19

Issue

4

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Zhu, X., Bouganim, N., Vandermeer, L., Dent, S. F., Dranitsaris, G., & Clemons, M. J. (2012). Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience. Current Oncology, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.948
Zhu, X., N. Bouganim, L. Vandermeer, S. F. Dent, G. Dranitsaris, and M. J. Clemons. “Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience.” Current Oncology 19, no. 4 (January 1, 2012). https://doi.org/10.3747/co.19.948.
Zhu X, Bouganim N, Vandermeer L, Dent SF, Dranitsaris G, Clemons MJ. Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience. Current Oncology. 2012 Jan 1;19(4).
Zhu X, Bouganim N, Vandermeer L, Dent SF, Dranitsaris G, Clemons MJ. Use and delivery of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy-single-centre experience. Current Oncology. 2012 Jan 1;19(4).

Published In

Current Oncology

DOI

EISSN

1718-7729

Publication Date

January 1, 2012

Volume

19

Issue

4

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis