Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Independence of clinical events committees: A consensus statement from clinical research organizations.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Spitzer, E; Fanaroff, AC; Gibson, CM; Seltzer, J; McFadden, E; Ali, M; Wilson, M; Menon, V; Mehran, R; Held, C; Mahaffey, KW; Lopes, RD
Published in: Am Heart J
June 2022

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials are the gold standard to assess the causal relationship between an intervention and subsequent outcomes, also known as clinical endpoints. In order to limit bias, central clinical events committees (CEC) are established to ensure consistent event reporting across participating centers, as well as complete and accurate ascertainment of endpoints. However, defining independence is challenging. METHODS: This consensus statement was generated by teleconferences and electronic communications among clinical research organizations from the United States, Europe and Australia. This document does not constitute regulatory guidance. RESULTS: An independent CEC is defined when the adjudicators are not primarily involved in designing, funding, sponsoring, organizing, conducting, analyzing or regulating the clinical trial for which they serve as an adjudicator, beyond their role as CEC member. Moreover, independence requires absence of conflicts of interest with the steering committee, sponsor, grant giver, manufacturer, coordinating center, other independent committees, core laboratories, medical monitor, safety physician, participating clinical sites, statistician or data manager, regulatory agencies or authorities, which could influence (or be perceived to influence) a member's objectivity in evaluating trial data. Such conflicts of interest include financial benefits, directing or advisory role (paid or unpaid), decision-making position, as well as being a direct relative. An independent adjudicator has no other role within a clinical trial. CONCLUSIONS: This consensus statement presents a standardized definition of an independent CEC to be considered by clinical research organizations, manufacturers, and investigators. In addition, it provides recommendations on best practices for implementation of an independent CEC.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

June 2022

Volume

248

Start / End Page

120 / 129

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Humans
  • Europe
  • Consensus
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Bias
  • Australia
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Spitzer, E., Fanaroff, A. C., Gibson, C. M., Seltzer, J., McFadden, E., Ali, M., … Lopes, R. D. (2022). Independence of clinical events committees: A consensus statement from clinical research organizations. Am Heart J, 248, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.03.005
Spitzer, Ernest, Alexander C. Fanaroff, C Michael Gibson, Jonathan Seltzer, Eugene McFadden, Maria Ali, Matthew Wilson, et al. “Independence of clinical events committees: A consensus statement from clinical research organizations.Am Heart J 248 (June 2022): 120–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2022.03.005.
Spitzer E, Fanaroff AC, Gibson CM, Seltzer J, McFadden E, Ali M, et al. Independence of clinical events committees: A consensus statement from clinical research organizations. Am Heart J. 2022 Jun;248:120–9.
Spitzer, Ernest, et al. “Independence of clinical events committees: A consensus statement from clinical research organizations.Am Heart J, vol. 248, June 2022, pp. 120–29. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2022.03.005.
Spitzer E, Fanaroff AC, Gibson CM, Seltzer J, McFadden E, Ali M, Wilson M, Menon V, Mehran R, Held C, Mahaffey KW, Lopes RD. Independence of clinical events committees: A consensus statement from clinical research organizations. Am Heart J. 2022 Jun;248:120–129.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am Heart J

DOI

EISSN

1097-6744

Publication Date

June 2022

Volume

248

Start / End Page

120 / 129

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Humans
  • Europe
  • Consensus
  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • Bias
  • Australia
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology