Skip to main content

Prognostic Impact of Hybrid Comprehensive Telerehabilitation Regarding Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction-Subanalysis of the TELEREH-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Irzmański, R; Glowczynska, R; Banach, M; Szalewska, D; Piotrowicz, R; Kowalik, I; Pencina, MJ; Zareba, W; Orzechowski, P; Pluta, S; Kalarus, Z ...
Published in: J Clin Med
March 26, 2022

AIMS: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effects of individually prescribed hybrid comprehensive telerehabilitation (HCTR) implemented at patients' homes on left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Telerehabilitation in Heart Failure Patients trial (TELEREH-HF) is a multicenter, prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, parallel-group, controlled trial involving HF patients assigned either to HCTR involving a remotely monitored home training program in conjunction with usual care (HCTR group) or usual care only (UC group). The patient in the HCTR group underwent a 9-week HCTR program consisting of two stages: an initial stage (1 week) conducted in hospital and the subsequent stage (eight weeks) of home-based HCTR five times weekly. Due to difficulties of proper assessment and differences in the evaluation of diastolic function in patients with atrial fibrillation, we included in our subanalysis only patients with sinus rhythm. Depending on the grade of diastolic dysfunction, patients were assigned to subgroups with mild diastolic (MDD) or severe diastolic dysfunction (SDD), both in HCTR (HCTR-MDD and HCTR-SDD) and UC groups (UC-MDD and UC-SDD). Changes from baseline to 9 weeks in echocardiographic parameters were seen only in A velocities in HCTR-MDD vs. UC-MDD; no significant shifts between groups of different diastolic dysfunction grades were observed after HCTR. All-cause mortality was higher in UC-SDD vs. UC-MDD with no difference between HCTR-SDD and HCTR-MDD. Higher probability of HF hospitalization was observed in HCTR-SDD than HCTR-MDD and in UC-SDD than UC-MDD. No differences in the probability of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization were found. CONCLUSIONS: HCTR did not influence diastolic function in HF patients in a significant manner. The grade of diastolic dysfunction had an impact on mortality only in the UC group and HF hospitalization over a 12-24-month follow-up in HCTR and UC groups.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Clin Med

DOI

ISSN

2077-0383

Publication Date

March 26, 2022

Volume

11

Issue

7

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Irzmański, R., Glowczynska, R., Banach, M., Szalewska, D., Piotrowicz, R., Kowalik, I., … Piotrowicz, E. (2022). Prognostic Impact of Hybrid Comprehensive Telerehabilitation Regarding Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction-Subanalysis of the TELEREH-HF Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071844
Irzmański, Robert, Renata Glowczynska, Maciej Banach, Dominika Szalewska, Ryszard Piotrowicz, Ilona Kowalik, Michael J. Pencina, et al. “Prognostic Impact of Hybrid Comprehensive Telerehabilitation Regarding Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction-Subanalysis of the TELEREH-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.J Clin Med 11, no. 7 (March 26, 2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071844.
Irzmański R, Glowczynska R, Banach M, Szalewska D, Piotrowicz R, Kowalik I, Pencina MJ, Zareba W, Orzechowski P, Pluta S, Kalarus Z, Opolski G, Piotrowicz E. Prognostic Impact of Hybrid Comprehensive Telerehabilitation Regarding Diastolic Dysfunction in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction-Subanalysis of the TELEREH-HF Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 26;11(7).

Published In

J Clin Med

DOI

ISSN

2077-0383

Publication Date

March 26, 2022

Volume

11

Issue

7

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences