Skip to main content
construction release_alert
The Scholars Team is working with OIT to resolve some issues with the Scholars search index
cancel
Journal cover image

Comparison of Best versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Publication ,  Journal Article
Smith, J; Shaffrey, C; Lafage, V; Schwab, F; Protopsaltis, T; Klineberg, E; Gupta, M; Hostin, R; Ming-Fu, K; Soroceanu, A; Hart, R; Burton, D ...
Published in: Global Spine Journal
May 1, 2015

Introduction Adults with spinal deformity typically present with pain and disability. Our objective was to compare outcomes for op and nonop treatment for ASD based on a prospective, multicenter patient population. Patients and Methods This is a multicenter, prospective analysis of consecutive patients with ASD electing for op or non-op care at enrollment. Inclusion criteria are age < 18 years and ASD. Propensity scores were used to match an op and nonop patients based on baseline (BL) ODI, SRS22, maximum thoracolumbar/lumbar Cobb angle, pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI–LL), and leg pain numeric rating scale (NRS) score. Results A total of 689 patients met criteria, including 286 op and 403 non-op, with mean ages of 53 and 55 years, minimum 2-year follow-up rates of 86 and 55%, and mean follow-up of 24.7 and 24.8 months, respectively. At BL, compared with nonop, op patients had significantly worse HRQL based on ODI, SRS22, SF36, and leg and back pain NRS (p > 0.001) and had worse deformity based on pelvic tilt, PI–LL, and C7SVA (p > 0.002). Before reaching minimum 2-year follow-up, 38 non-op patients converted to op treatment and were analyzed in the op group. At minimum 2-year follow-up, all HRQL measures assessed significantly improved for op patients (p > 0.001), but none of these measures improved significantly for non-op patients (p < 0.11). Overall, 97 matched op–non-op pairs were identified based on propensity scores. At last follow-up, the 97 matched op patients had significant improvement in all HRQL measures assessed (p > 0.001), but the 97 matched non-op patients lacked significant improvement in any of the HRQL measures (p < 0.20). Paired op–non-op analysis demonstrated the op patients to have significantly better HRQL scores at follow-up for all measures assessed (p > 0.001), except SF36 MCS (p = 0.058). Overall minor and major complication rates for op patients were 53 and 40%, respectively. Conclusion Op treatment for ASD can provide significant improvement of HRQL measures at minimum 2-year follow-up. In contrast, non-op treatment appears to at best maintain presenting levels of pain and disability.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Global Spine Journal

DOI

EISSN

2192-5690

ISSN

2192-5682

Publication Date

May 1, 2015

Volume

5

Issue

1_suppl

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Smith, J., Shaffrey, C., Lafage, V., Schwab, F., Protopsaltis, T., Klineberg, E., … Ames, C. (2015). Comparison of Best versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Global Spine Journal, 5(1_suppl). https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0035-1554513
Smith, J., C. Shaffrey, V. Lafage, F. Schwab, T. Protopsaltis, E. Klineberg, M. Gupta, et al. “Comparison of Best versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.” Global Spine Journal 5, no. 1_suppl (May 1, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0035-1554513.
Smith J, Shaffrey C, Lafage V, Schwab F, Protopsaltis T, Klineberg E, et al. Comparison of Best versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Global Spine Journal. 2015 May 1;5(1_suppl).
Smith, J., et al. “Comparison of Best versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.” Global Spine Journal, vol. 5, no. 1_suppl, May 2015. Scopus, doi:10.1055/S-0035-1554513.
Smith J, Shaffrey C, Lafage V, Schwab F, Protopsaltis T, Klineberg E, Gupta M, Hostin R, Ming-Fu K, Soroceanu A, Hart R, Burton D, Bess S, Ames C. Comparison of Best versus Worst Clinical Outcomes for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter Assessment with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up. Global Spine Journal. 2015 May 1;5(1_suppl).
Journal cover image

Published In

Global Spine Journal

DOI

EISSN

2192-5690

ISSN

2192-5682

Publication Date

May 1, 2015

Volume

5

Issue

1_suppl

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences