Skip to main content
Journal cover image

A Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Methods Analysis to Identify the Relative Importance of Factors Students and Providers Evaluate When Making a Job Choice.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gillette, C; Ostermann, J; Garvick, S; Momen, J; Everett, C; Boles, G; Crandall, S
Published in: Journal of health care for the poor and underserved
January 2022

Little is known about the relative importance of factors that contribute to job choices among health care providers. A convenience sample of 173 health care providers (N=134) and physician assistant students (N=39) completed a cross-sectional survey. Participants rated the importance of sixteen job- (e.g., work environment), community- (e.g., recreational opportunities), and personal-related factors (e.g., children) and one open-ended item. The highest rated item, on average, was an opportunity to make a difference in patient quality of life (mean (M)=4.57, standard deviation (SD)=0.63) while the lowest rated item was wealth/prestige of living in a certain area (M=2.43, SD=1.05). The average importance rating was similar across types of providers and between providers and students. While personal interest to positively affect patients' quality of life was rated as the most important factor, almost all the studied items were rated as important or very important by the majority of participants.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of health care for the poor and underserved

DOI

EISSN

1548-6869

ISSN

1049-2089

Publication Date

January 2022

Volume

33

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1891 / 1904

Related Subject Headings

  • Workplace
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Students
  • Quality of Life
  • Public Health
  • Humans
  • Data Collection
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Child
  • 4206 Public health
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gillette, C., Ostermann, J., Garvick, S., Momen, J., Everett, C., Boles, G., & Crandall, S. (2022). A Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Methods Analysis to Identify the Relative Importance of Factors Students and Providers Evaluate When Making a Job Choice. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 33(4), 1891–1904. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2022.0144
Gillette, Chris, Jan Ostermann, Sarah Garvick, Jennifer Momen, Chris Everett, Ginger Boles, and Sonia Crandall. “A Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Methods Analysis to Identify the Relative Importance of Factors Students and Providers Evaluate When Making a Job Choice.Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 33, no. 4 (January 2022): 1891–1904. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2022.0144.
Gillette C, Ostermann J, Garvick S, Momen J, Everett C, Boles G, et al. A Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Methods Analysis to Identify the Relative Importance of Factors Students and Providers Evaluate When Making a Job Choice. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved. 2022 Jan;33(4):1891–904.
Gillette, Chris, et al. “A Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Methods Analysis to Identify the Relative Importance of Factors Students and Providers Evaluate When Making a Job Choice.Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, vol. 33, no. 4, Jan. 2022, pp. 1891–904. Epmc, doi:10.1353/hpu.2022.0144.
Gillette C, Ostermann J, Garvick S, Momen J, Everett C, Boles G, Crandall S. A Cross-Sectional, Mixed-Methods Analysis to Identify the Relative Importance of Factors Students and Providers Evaluate When Making a Job Choice. Journal of health care for the poor and underserved. 2022 Jan;33(4):1891–1904.
Journal cover image

Published In

Journal of health care for the poor and underserved

DOI

EISSN

1548-6869

ISSN

1049-2089

Publication Date

January 2022

Volume

33

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1891 / 1904

Related Subject Headings

  • Workplace
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Students
  • Quality of Life
  • Public Health
  • Humans
  • Data Collection
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Child
  • 4206 Public health