Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Sins of omission: A meta-research study evaluating the omission of operability in published retrospective comparisons of surgery with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lorenz, J; Moghanaki, D; Keshava, H; Harpole, DH; Bradley, JD; Higgins, KA; Rusthoven, CG; Stokes, WA
Published in: Lung Cancer
January 2023

INTRODUCTION: Patients receiving stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are typically inoperable, in concordance with guidelines that advocate surgical resection as preferred treatment for operable patients. This differential treatment allocation complicates retrospective comparisons of surgery with SBRT by introducing the potential for confounding by operability. METHODS: PubMed was queried for manuscripts reporting primary data from retrospective comparisons of overall survival (OS) between patients undergoing surgery versus SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. Each manuscript was categorized for two outcomes: (1) whether treatment allocation was based on a determination of patient operability, and (2) whether a direct OS comparison between operable SBRT patients and surgically treated patients was included. Associations with variables of interest were measured with statistical significance prespecified at p < 0.10. RESULTS: From 3,072 manuscripts identified in our query, sixty-one analyses met screening criteria. Twenty-one (34 %) reported operability status influencing treatment allocation. These were more likely to be published in journals with a surgical focus (52 vs 20 %) and impact factor < 5 (81 vs 58 %), and to contain cohorts from institutional datasets (81 vs 55 %), and to have a radiation oncologist as first (43 vs 25 %) or senior (43 vs 28 %) author. Seven (11 %) manuscripts featured a direct OS comparison between SBRT and surgery. CONCLUSION: Nearly-two-thirds of peer-reviewed retrospective studies that have compared OS between surgery and SBRT for early-stage NSCLC lack information on patient operability status, and nearly 90% lack a direct comparison between operable SBRT patients and those receiving surgery.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Lung Cancer

DOI

EISSN

1872-8332

Publication Date

January 2023

Volume

175

Start / End Page

57 / 59

Location

Ireland

Related Subject Headings

  • Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Radiosurgery
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lorenz, J., Moghanaki, D., Keshava, H., Harpole, D. H., Bradley, J. D., Higgins, K. A., … Stokes, W. A. (2023). Sins of omission: A meta-research study evaluating the omission of operability in published retrospective comparisons of surgery with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 175, 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.11.011
Lorenz, J., D. Moghanaki, H. Keshava, D. H. Harpole, J. D. Bradley, K. A. Higgins, C. G. Rusthoven, and W. A. Stokes. “Sins of omission: A meta-research study evaluating the omission of operability in published retrospective comparisons of surgery with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer 175 (January 2023): 57–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.11.011.
Journal cover image

Published In

Lung Cancer

DOI

EISSN

1872-8332

Publication Date

January 2023

Volume

175

Start / End Page

57 / 59

Location

Ireland

Related Subject Headings

  • Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Radiosurgery
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 3202 Clinical sciences