Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Timing of sedation and patient-reported pain outcomes during cardiac catheterization: Results from the UNTAP-intervention study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mall, A; Girton, TA; Yardley, K; Ronn, M; Cross, E; Smith, PJ; Rossman, P; McEwen, T; Ohman, EM; Jones, WS; Granger, BB
Published in: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
January 14, 2023

BACKGROUND: Invasive cardiac catheterization (CC) temporarily increases pain, discomfort, and anxiety. Procedural sedation is deployed to mitigate these symptoms, though practice varies. Research evaluating peri-procedural patient-reported outcomes is lacking. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 175 patients undergoing CC to short interval ([SI] group, <6 min) or long interval ([LI] group, ≥6 min) time intervals between initial intravenous sedation and local anesthetic administration. Outcomes included: (1) total pain medication use, (2) patient-reported and behaviorally assessed pain and (3) patient satisfaction during outpatient CC. Generalized linear mixed effect models were used to evaluate the impact of treatment time interval on total medication utilization, pain, and satisfaction. Among enrollees the mean age was 62 (standard deviation [SD] = 13.4), a majority were male (66%), white (74%), and overweight (mean body mass index = 28.5 [SD = 5.6]). Total pain medication use did not vary between treatment groups (p = 0.257), with no difference in total fentanyl (p = 0.288) or midazolam (p = 0.292). Post-treatment pain levels and nurse-observed pain were not statistically significant between groups (p = 0.324 & p = 0.656, respectively. No significant differences with satisfaction with sedation were found between the groups (p = 0.95) Patient-reported pain, satisfaction and nurse-observed measures of pain did not differ, after adjustment for demographic and procedural factors. Analyses of treatment effect modification revealed that postprocedure self-reported pain levels varied systematically between individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (SI = 2.2 [0.8, 3.6] vs. LI = 0.7 [-0.6, 2.0]) compared with participants not undergoing PCI (SI = 0.4 [-0.8, 1.7] vs. LI = 0.7 [-0.3, 1.6]) (p = 0.043 for interaction). CONCLUSION: No consistent treatment differences were found for total medication dose, pain, or satisfaction regardless of timing between sedation and local anesthetic. Treatment moderations were seen for patients undergoing PCI. Further investigation of how procedural and individual factors impact the patient experience during CC is needed.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

DOI

EISSN

1522-726X

Publication Date

January 14, 2023

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mall, A., Girton, T. A., Yardley, K., Ronn, M., Cross, E., Smith, P. J., … Granger, B. B. (2023). Timing of sedation and patient-reported pain outcomes during cardiac catheterization: Results from the UNTAP-intervention study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30535
Mall, Anna, T Andrew Girton, Kevin Yardley, Meghan Ronn, Elinore Cross, Patrick J. Smith, Paige Rossman, et al. “Timing of sedation and patient-reported pain outcomes during cardiac catheterization: Results from the UNTAP-intervention study.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, January 14, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30535.
Mall A, Girton TA, Yardley K, Ronn M, Cross E, Smith PJ, et al. Timing of sedation and patient-reported pain outcomes during cardiac catheterization: Results from the UNTAP-intervention study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan 14;
Mall, Anna, et al. “Timing of sedation and patient-reported pain outcomes during cardiac catheterization: Results from the UNTAP-intervention study.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, Jan. 2023. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/ccd.30535.
Mall A, Girton TA, Yardley K, Ronn M, Cross E, Smith PJ, Rossman P, McEwen T, Ohman EM, Jones WS, Granger BB. Timing of sedation and patient-reported pain outcomes during cardiac catheterization: Results from the UNTAP-intervention study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan 14;
Journal cover image

Published In

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv

DOI

EISSN

1522-726X

Publication Date

January 14, 2023

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Cardiovascular System & Hematology
  • 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
  • 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology