An Elite Privilege: Top-Ranked Medical Schools Provide Fewer Comparative Performance Data on Their Students.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine differences in the reporting of performance data on medical student performance evaluations (MSPEs) by medical school ranking. METHODS: MSPEs from all US allopathic and osteopathic medical schools received by a single diagnostic radiology residency program during the 2021-2022 application cycle were retrospectively reviewed. Preclinical class and core clerkship grades were categorized as pass/fail or multitiered. Comparative summative assessments provided in the MSPEs were recorded. Medical schools were grouped by their US News & World Report rankings, and the proportion of reported performance metrics for each group was compared. RESULTS: Information from 95% of US allopathic medical schools (148 of 155) and 73% of osteopathic medical schools (27 of 37) was collected, on the basis of 1,046 applications received. For preclinical classes, multitiered grading was reported by no schools ranked in the top 10, 17% of schools ranked 11th to 50th, 52% of schools ranked 51st to 100th, and 59% of unranked schools (P < .001). For core clinical clerkships, multitiered grades were reported by 70% of the top 10 ranked schools, 90% of schools ranked 11th to 50th, 94% of those ranked 51st to 100th, and 94% of unranked schools (P = .0463). Comparative summative assessments were reported by none of the top 10 ranked schools, 56% of schools ranked 11th to 50th, 80% of those ranked 51th to 100th, and 81% of unranked schools (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher ranked medical schools are less likely to provide comparative assessment data on their MSPEs, which may disadvantage students from lower ranked medical schools.

Duke Scholars

Author Charles Mason Maxfield Radiology, Pediatric Radiology

Author Joseph Yi-Qiao Cao Radiology, Pediatric Radiology

Author Jonathan Martin Radiology, Interventional Radiology

Author Lars Johannes L Grimm Radiology, Breast Imaging