Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Risk, reasons for refusal, and impact of counseling on consent among ED patients declining HIV screening.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ubhayakar, ND; Lindsell, CJ; Raab, DL; Ruffner, AH; Trott, AT; Fichtenbaum, CJ; Lyons, MS
Published in: Am J Emerg Med
May 2011

Screening for HIV in the emergency department (ED) is recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The relative importance of efforts to increase consent among those who currently decline screening is not well understood. We compared the risk characteristics reported by patients who decline risk-targeted, opt-in ED screening with those who consent. We secondarily recorded reasons for declining testing and reversal of the decision to decline testing after prevention counseling. Of 199 eligible patients, 106 consented to testing and 93 declined. Of those declining, 60 (64.5%) of 93 completed a risk assessment. There were no differences in HIV risk behaviors between groups. Declining patients reported recent testing in 73.3% of cases. After prevention counseling, 4 (6.7%) of 60 who initially declined asked to be tested. Given similarities between those who decline and those who consent to testing, efforts to increase consent may be beneficial. However, this should be tempered by the finding that many declined because of a recent negative test. Emphasizing risk during prevention counseling is not a promising strategy for improving opt-in consent rates.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am J Emerg Med

DOI

EISSN

1532-8171

Publication Date

May 2011

Volume

29

Issue

4

Start / End Page

367 / 372

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Mass Screening
  • Male
  • Informed Consent
  • Humans
  • HIV Infections
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ubhayakar, N. D., Lindsell, C. J., Raab, D. L., Ruffner, A. H., Trott, A. T., Fichtenbaum, C. J., & Lyons, M. S. (2011). Risk, reasons for refusal, and impact of counseling on consent among ED patients declining HIV screening. Am J Emerg Med, 29(4), 367–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.10.005
Ubhayakar, Nitin D., Christopher J. Lindsell, Dana L. Raab, Andrew H. Ruffner, Alexander T. Trott, Carl J. Fichtenbaum, and Michael S. Lyons. “Risk, reasons for refusal, and impact of counseling on consent among ED patients declining HIV screening.Am J Emerg Med 29, no. 4 (May 2011): 367–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.10.005.
Ubhayakar ND, Lindsell CJ, Raab DL, Ruffner AH, Trott AT, Fichtenbaum CJ, et al. Risk, reasons for refusal, and impact of counseling on consent among ED patients declining HIV screening. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 May;29(4):367–72.
Ubhayakar, Nitin D., et al. “Risk, reasons for refusal, and impact of counseling on consent among ED patients declining HIV screening.Am J Emerg Med, vol. 29, no. 4, May 2011, pp. 367–72. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2009.10.005.
Ubhayakar ND, Lindsell CJ, Raab DL, Ruffner AH, Trott AT, Fichtenbaum CJ, Lyons MS. Risk, reasons for refusal, and impact of counseling on consent among ED patients declining HIV screening. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 May;29(4):367–372.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Emerg Med

DOI

EISSN

1532-8171

Publication Date

May 2011

Volume

29

Issue

4

Start / End Page

367 / 372

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Middle Aged
  • Mass Screening
  • Male
  • Informed Consent
  • Humans
  • HIV Infections