Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Inadequate provision of postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia in the ED.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bonomo, JB; Butler, AS; Lindsell, CJ; Venkat, A
Published in: Am J Emerg Med
May 2008

INTRODUCTION: Patients intubated in the emergency department (ED) often have extended ED stays. We hypothesize that ED intubated patients receive inadequate postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia after rapid sequence induction (RSI). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of every adult intubated in a tertiary-care ED (July 2003-June 2004). Patients were included if they underwent RSI, remained in the ED for more than 30 minutes post intubation, and survived to admission. Presuming a mean patient weight of 70 kg, we defined adequacy of anxiolysis and analgesia on the provision postintubation of weight-based doses of lorazepam (0.77 mg/h) or midazolam (4.2 mg/h) and fentanyl (35 microg/h), referenced from pharmaceutical texts. Demographic data, time in ED, and dosage of each medication given were abstracted. The proportion, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), of patients receiving inadequate anxiolysis and analgesia were computed. RESULTS: One hundred seventeen patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean time in the ED was 4.2 hours (SD +/- 3.1 hours). Thirty-nine patients received no anxiolytic (33%, CI 25%-43%), and 62 received no analgesic (53%, CI 44%-62%). Twenty-three patients received neither anxiolytic nor analgesic (20%, CI 13%-28%). Of 70 patients given postintubation vecuronium, 67 received either no or inadequate anxiolysis or analgesia (96%, CI 87%-99%). Overall, 87 of 117 patients received no or inadequate anxiolysis (74%, CI 65%-82%); and 88 of 117 received no or inadequate analgesia (75%, CI 66%-83%). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing RSI in the ED frequently receive inadequate postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Emerg Med

DOI

EISSN

1532-8171

Publication Date

May 2008

Volume

26

Issue

4

Start / End Page

469 / 472

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Retrospective Studies
  • Pain
  • Middle Aged
  • Midazolam
  • Male
  • Lorazepam
  • Intubation, Intratracheal
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Humans
  • Fentanyl
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bonomo, J. B., Butler, A. S., Lindsell, C. J., & Venkat, A. (2008). Inadequate provision of postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia in the ED. Am J Emerg Med, 26(4), 469–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2007.05.024
Bonomo, Jordan B., Andrew S. Butler, Christopher J. Lindsell, and Arvind Venkat. “Inadequate provision of postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia in the ED.Am J Emerg Med 26, no. 4 (May 2008): 469–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2007.05.024.
Bonomo JB, Butler AS, Lindsell CJ, Venkat A. Inadequate provision of postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 May;26(4):469–72.
Bonomo, Jordan B., et al. “Inadequate provision of postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia in the ED.Am J Emerg Med, vol. 26, no. 4, May 2008, pp. 469–72. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.05.024.
Bonomo JB, Butler AS, Lindsell CJ, Venkat A. Inadequate provision of postintubation anxiolysis and analgesia in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2008 May;26(4):469–472.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Emerg Med

DOI

EISSN

1532-8171

Publication Date

May 2008

Volume

26

Issue

4

Start / End Page

469 / 472

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Retrospective Studies
  • Pain
  • Middle Aged
  • Midazolam
  • Male
  • Lorazepam
  • Intubation, Intratracheal
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Humans
  • Fentanyl