
Nuclear Sovereignty
Publication
, Journal Article
Hardt, M
Published in: Theory and Event
October 1, 2019
It is a paradox today that, although the dangers posed by nuclear arsenals continue undiminished, the social movements and intellectual arguments opposing them have virtually dis-appeared. This essay argues that in order to mount an effective movement to abolish nuclear weapons we must first understand clearly the principle roles they play, which are primarily political and economic: to support ever more tenuous claims to sovereign power and to bolster the functioning of capital. If we want to con-test the nuclear regimes effectively, we will need to find ways to attack sovereignty and capital.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Theory and Event
DOI
EISSN
1092-311X
ISSN
2572-6633
Publication Date
October 1, 2019
Volume
22
Issue
4
Start / End Page
842 / 868
Related Subject Headings
- 4702 Cultural studies
- 4408 Political science
- 2203 Philosophy
- 2002 Cultural Studies
- 1606 Political Science
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Hardt, M. (2019). Nuclear Sovereignty. Theory and Event, 22(4), 842–868. https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2019.0056
Hardt, M. “Nuclear Sovereignty.” Theory and Event 22, no. 4 (October 1, 2019): 842–68. https://doi.org/10.1353/tae.2019.0056.
Hardt M. Nuclear Sovereignty. Theory and Event. 2019 Oct 1;22(4):842–68.
Hardt, M. “Nuclear Sovereignty.” Theory and Event, vol. 22, no. 4, Oct. 2019, pp. 842–68. Scopus, doi:10.1353/tae.2019.0056.
Hardt M. Nuclear Sovereignty. Theory and Event. 2019 Oct 1;22(4):842–868.

Published In
Theory and Event
DOI
EISSN
1092-311X
ISSN
2572-6633
Publication Date
October 1, 2019
Volume
22
Issue
4
Start / End Page
842 / 868
Related Subject Headings
- 4702 Cultural studies
- 4408 Political science
- 2203 Philosophy
- 2002 Cultural Studies
- 1606 Political Science